Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Culture Care Diversity and Universality: A Theory of Nursing edited by Madeleine M. Leininger, PhD, RN, FAAN; Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett, 2001; 448 pages, $34.95 This new release of a book published 10 years ago by the National League for Nursing is said to be the definitive and comprehensive source for Leininger's care theory. It is presented in three parts: Part I is a description of the theory and its underpinnings by Leininger. Part II, in nine chapters, describes the research method to study care, by Leininger, followed by research by various authors who have used the theory and method. Part III, in three chapters, all by Leininger, focuses on findings from research that have used the theory and the method and use of the theory in education and administration. A final chapter addresses the relevance of the care theory in projecting the future of nursing. The reissue of this book is both timely and welcome. Leininger has almost single-handedly transformed our thinking about the need for care in all domains, whether it be in nursing care, in educational programs, or administration of patient care services. As our country has become more and more multicultural, and as we have come to see the impact of events in other parts of the world on our daily lives, the theory of culture care diversity and universality assumes an importance not previously felt or understood. The author makes some attempt to place her care theory within the framework of the broader theory development enterprise in nursing and the different approaches used to develop theory. She concludes that care theory does not fit well with existing thinking on theory development approaches, and that theories in nursing have been within the logical positivist and quantitative paradigm. Culture care theory, on the other hand, was conceptualized within the qualitative discovery paradigm with largely inductive emic (people-centered) views and not from the researcher's a priori (p. 24). The central issue of concern to this reviewer is not with the utility and elegance of this theory, for it has both. It is rather, that it claims too much for itself and does not recognize the place, utility, co-existence, or indeed, complementarity, of other theoretical approaches, especially if they are developed within the positivist paradigm, and worse yet, if they demand quantitative approaches for verification of hypotheses derived from them. The book appears to claim that care theory and knowledge are sufficient to address all dimensions of nursing. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle