MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2315271201 · doi:10.1097/ede.0000000000000061

Fruits, Vegetables, and Hypertensive Disease Mortality

2014· letter· en· W2315271201 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Sangita Sharma, Fariba Kolahdooz, Shelly Vik, Deborah M. Green, Laurence N. Kolonel

Notice bibliographique

RevueEpidemiology · 2014
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueNutritional Studies and Diet
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Alberta
Organismes subventionnairesNational Cancer Institute
Mots-clésMedicineAnthropometryEthnic groupCohortDemographyGerontologyEnvironmental healthNational Death IndexDiseaseCohort studyStroke (engine)Confidence intervalHazard ratioInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Studies have assessed adherence to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) dietary recommendations and risk of chronic disease,1,2 but none has examined the degree of adherence in large ethnically diverse populations. We examined sex-specific associations between adherence to the USDA recommendations for fruit and vegetable intake and hypertensive disease mortality. The Multiethnic Cohort includes men and women 45–75 years of age, representing five ethnic groups living in Hawaii and Los Angeles County between 1993 and 1996. Potential participants were mailed a comprehensive questionnaire with a detailed quantitative food frequency questionnaire and questions on demography, anthropometry, lifestyle factors, and medical history (including stroke and hypertension). Details of the food frequency questionnaire and study design have been reported elsewhere.3 Institutional Review Board approval was given by the University of Hawaii and University of Southern California. After excluding 21,760 subjects who were missing data on smoking history or who had implausible diets or implausible/missing anthropometric information, there were 174,888 participants for analysis. We identified deaths from hypertensive disease (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition [ICD-9] codes 401.9–404.9/ICD-10 codes I10, I110, I119–120, I129, I131–32) by linking cohort data with state death files and the US National Death Index. Individual vegetable and fruit servings were computed by summing all servings across the appropriate food items on the food frequency questionnaire. Degree of adherence was determined as a percentage, calculated as the daily serving divided by US serving recommendations4 for appropriate age and calorie intake. Relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models with age as the time metric. The exposure variable was examined as both a binary variable (adherent with dietary recommendations versus not) and a categorical variable (based on quintile cut-points for the distribution of adherence for the entire cohort). Ordinal variables representing the median quintile values were tested for linear trends. Person-times were determined from the date of cohort entry to the date of death or end of study (31 December 2001). Models were adjusted for ethnicity, time in study, education, energy intake, smoking, body mass index, physical activity, history of diabetes, intake of other food groups (meat, dairy, and grains), and alcohol intake. Among women, models were additionally adjusted for history of hormone replacement therapy. After an 8-year follow-up, we identified 188 men and 165 women who died of hypertensive disease. Persons dying of hypertensive diseases were similar to the whole cohort in mean daily energy intakes and percentages of energy from fat, saturated fat, and alcohol, as well as in mean daily serving intakes of vegetable, fruit, meat, dairy, and grains. Compared with all participants, persons dying of hypertensive disease had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension, higher mean pack-years of cigarette smoking, and lower education. Women dying of hypertensive disease were more likely to be overweight. No associations were observed between adherence to dietary recom men dations for vegetable or fruit intake and hypertensive disease mortality in the analyses based on a binary exposure (Table). In the analysis by quintiles, hypertensive disease mortality among women was reduced for those who most exceeded recommendations for vegetable consumption (for ≥151% adherent compared with <50% adherent: RR = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.27–0.94]; test for trend, P = 0.08). There were no associations between fruit intake and hypertensive disease mortality in either sex.TABLE: Adherence to the USDA Dietary Recommendations and Risk of Death from Hypertensive Disease Among Men and WomenaThe beneficial effect of high vegetable intake on the risk of fatal hypertensive disease in women is consistent with previous studies.5,6 The exact mechanisms for this beneficial effect of vegetables are still unknown but might involve nutrients and phytochemicals (which could have independent or joint effects), as well as low dietary glycemic load and energy density.7 Inconsistent findings between men and women (test for interaction, P = 0.06 for the highest level of vegetable intake) may result from physiological, biochemical, and genetic differences or from differences in food consumption. Future studies may clarify nutritional associations that were beyond the scope of this study. Sangita Sharma Fariba Kolahdooz Shelly Vik Aboriginal and Global Health Research Group Department of Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada [email protected] Deborah M. Green Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery Neurocritical Care Boston University School of Medicine Boston, MA Laurence N. Kolonel Cancer Research Center of Hawaii University of Hawaii Honolulu, HI

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,127
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,903

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,112
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,231 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEpidemiologyMême sujetNutritional Studies and DietTravaux en français237 207