MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2315921930 · doi:10.4043/otc-19869-ms

Understanding Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor and Corrosion Inhibitor Interactions

2009· article· en· W2315921930 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueProceedings of Offshore Technology Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Établissements canadiensNalco (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCitationComputer scienceEngineeringLibrary science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

SS: Flow Assurance: Understanding Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor and Corrosion Inhibitor Interactions Jennifer Moore; Jennifer Moore Nalco Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Leonard Ver Vers; Leonard Ver Vers Nalco Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Peter Conrad Peter Conrad Nalco Company Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Scholar Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 2009. Paper Number: OTC-19869-MS https://doi.org/10.4043/19869-MS Published: May 04 2009 Cite View This Citation Add to Citation Manager Share Icon Share Twitter LinkedIn Get Permissions Search Site Citation Moore, Jennifer, Vers, Leonard Ver, and Peter Conrad. "SS: Flow Assurance: Understanding Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitor and Corrosion Inhibitor Interactions." Paper presented at the Offshore Technology Conference, Houston, Texas, May 2009. doi: https://doi.org/10.4043/19869-MS Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex Search Dropdown Menu nav search search input Search input auto suggest search filter All ContentAll ProceedingsOffshore Technology ConferenceOTC Offshore Technology Conference Search Advanced Search AbstractKinetic Hydrate Inhibitors (KHI) are increasingly becoming more prevalent in the oil and gas industry, thus the knowledge of how they impact other oilfield chemicals becomes important. This paper will attempt to explain how these products impact both the KHIs and corrosion inhibitors (CI) performance in the presence of each other. Application: This paper will address fundamental properties of both chemistries and how their interaction can be understood at the molecular level. Ultimately, this fundamental understanding allows for a more informed selection of KHI and CI for sub-sea applications. Results, Observations, and Conclusions: A more in-depth understanding of how KHI and CI interact with each other will allow for better selection of these products and will help develop the next generation of these chemistries. By understanding at the molecular level more favorable selection can be made and problems of negative interaction can be avoided. This work will explore the possibility of two separate mechanisms that can cause KHIs and CIs to negatively impact each other. The two mechanisms will be explored by using LC/MS (Liquid Chromatography Mass Spectrum) and SFT (Surface Tension measurement) with the results from these exploratory techniques correlated to performance testing for both KHIs and CIs we hope to gain a better grasp of the underlying issue. Significance of Subject Matter: The compatibility of the KHI with the CI is not a well-understood phenomenon and this paper will address this compatibility from a chemistry point of view. Therefore, this provides a more fundamental insight into the interactions of KHI'S and CIs.IntroductionThe oil and gas industry is relying on more and more on chemical solutions for flow assurance and corrosion inhibition, however these chemicals not only interact with the environment they can interact with each other. Several papers (Frostman, L.M et al, Fu, B, Graham, G.M et al, Swanson, T.A et al and McDonald, A.W.R et al) have addressed this interaction highlighting, negative, positive or neutral impact from a performance standpoint. A literature review revels that none have delved into the chemistry of Kinetic Hydrate Inhibitors (KHI) and Corrosion Inhibitors (CI) to explore the interaction from a more fundamental viewpoint. Klomp et al (Klomp, U et al) reports that the origins of these incompatibles are still unknown. This stems from the fact that chemical vendors are hesitant to divulge chemical compositions to the industry. This paper will discuss the interaction of the KHIs and CIs at a fundamental level with the hope that a deeper understanding of why these incompatibilities exist will then enable a better-informed decision of a particular KHI and CI for an individual asset.Hydrate inhibition has traditionally used mechanical methods to avoid hydrate formation by preventing their formation this was accomplished utilizing heated/insulated pipes or by gas dehydration. Another conventional means of preventing hydrates is utilization of Thermodynamic Hydrate Inhibitors (THIs) such as methanol and monoethyleglycol. More recently hydrate control has been achieved through the use of Low Dosage Hydrate Inhibitors (LDHI). LDHI use has allowed for lower volumes of chemical to be employed. The two types of LDHI are anti-agglometerates (AAs) and kinetic hydrate inhibitors (KHIs). AA's allow the hydrate crystals to form but manage the size of the crystals so that they can be dispersed in the hydrocarbon fluid. The surfactant molecules are able to surround the hydrate crystal and prevent crystal growth. AAs are typically used for severe hydrate conditions and long shut-in periods. On the other hand KHI's interfere with the crystal nucleation process, thus delaying the onset of hydration for a significantly longer period of time. KHI's are typically used at more moderate sub-cooling and can be used at a wide variety of water cuts. LDHI's are typically of polymer type chemistry and commonly versions of polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) and/or polyvinylcaprolactam as either homopolymers or co-polymers. Keywords: kinetic hydrate inhibitor, technology conference, ppm, cmc, surface tension, khi performance, corrosion rate, inhibitor, spectrum, interface Subjects: Production Chemistry, Metallurgy and Biology, Flow Assurance, Hydrates This content is only available via PDF. 2009. Offshore Technology Conference You can access this article if you purchase or spend a download.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,086
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,193 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle