MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2316432777 · doi:10.1177/002070201106600421

An Alaskan Perspective

2011· article· en· W2316432777 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diddy R. M. Hitchins

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueArctic and Russian Policy Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBachelorArcticPoliticsThe arcticNorth poleGeographyLibrary sciencePolitical scienceArchaeologyOceanographyPhysical geographyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

My perspective on the Arctic is that of a Brit who has become an Alaskan: I am a Scot who grew up in England, where I earned my bachelor of science degree and a doctorate from the University of Essex. My first academic appointment was at the University of Ghana in West Africa and I have been on the faculty of the University of Alaska Anchorage, where I have specialized in comparative politics and international relations, for more than 30 years. I became interested in Arctic issues upon my arrival in Alaska and was the founding director of the Canadian studies program. Like many of my British compatriots, I grew up with broad global interests and an awareness of Britain's heritage of exploration, discovery, and colonization, including significant contributions to polar exploration both north and south.Educated in the UK, I had learned about British Antarctic and Arctic explorations and the role of the Hudson's Bay Company in exploring the remote regions of North America. I knew more about Canada than about the United States from my high school studies of North America, so I was amazed to discover on my arrival in Alaska in 1974 that there was very little knowledge or understanding of Canada in Alaska, and virtuaUy no communication between Alaska and the adjacent areas of Canada, British Columbia and the Yukon. Despite Alaska being a virtual exclave of the US, cut off from the contiguous states by Canada, there were no courses on Canada in the elementary or high school curriculums in Alaska, nor any at the campuses of the University of Alaska until the Canadian studies program was established at its Anchorage campus in 1986.The prevauing attitude towards Canada on the part of the informed public in Alaska could best be characterized as one of generalized suspicion, although I should hasten to add that that would also have been true for Alaskan attitudes towards most other foreign countries during the Cold War period. And indeed, Alaskans even had suspicions of their own federal government and of Americans outside Alaska.US-CANADA ARCTIC RELATIONS ATTHE OUTSETThe history of the relationship between Canada and the US as Arctic neighbours begins in 1867 with the US purchase of Alaska from the Russians, an act that is often regarded as one of the precipitating factors of Canadian confederation.1 In purchasing Alaska, the US gained territory in the north that extended into the Arctic; confederation created Canada out of what were formerly British colonies and Hudson's Bay Company territory (Rupert's Land) in the north and far north of North America. Thus the US and Canada became neighbours in the Arctic in 1867 at the border between Alaska and what later became the Yukon territory and the province of British Columbia.Relations between the remaining British in North America (largely in Canada) and the Americans had been tense after the U S won its independence: borders were not demarcated and there were regular skirmishes before and after the War of 1812 when the British burned the White House. The report that the British had traveUed right across the continent from Trois-Rivieres to the Arctic and Pacific oceans spurred President Thomas Jefferson to dispatch the corps of discovery under the leadership of captains Meriwether Lewis and William Clark to make good American possession of the continent after the Louisiana purchase. And the 1823 Monroe doctrine, which pronounced that henceforth the western hemisphere was not open to European intervention, was partly aimed at getting rid of the British from the Oregon territory. There was a definite feeling in the US at the time of the purchase that owning Alaska would facilitate America's acquisition of the rest of what is now western Canada, which was seen as a natural development in accordance with the US conception of manifest destiny.The original border between Russia, in possession of Alaska, and Great Britain, in possession of Canada, had been demarcated in 1825 but emanated from a series of treaty negotiations to end the Napoleonic Wars in which the US government had been deeply involved. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,920
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,158

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0250,008
Communication savante0,0100,007
Science ouverte0,0010,005
Intégrité de la recherche0,0060,008
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0340,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,363
Écart entre enseignants0,341 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisMême sujetArctic and Russian Policy StudiesTravaux en français237 207