MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2316539396 · doi:10.2307/40204228

Politics and Process at the United Nations: The Global Dance

2006· article· en· W2316539396 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
David M. Malone, Courtney Smith, Paul Heinbecker, Patricia Goff, W. Andy Knight

Notice bibliographique

RevueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy Analysis · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueGlobal Peace and Security Dynamics
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDancePoliticsPolitical sciencePolitical economySociologyLawArtLiterature

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

POLITICS AND PROCESS AT THE UNITED NATIONS The Global Dance Courtney B. Smith Boulder Lynne Rienner, 2006. 32gpp, US$24.99 paper (ISBN 1588263487)IRRELEVANT OR INDISPENSABLE The United Nations the 21st Century Paul Heinbecker & Patricia Goff, eds. Waterloo, ON: Wilfrid Laurier University Press, 2005. 160pp, $24.95 paper (ISBN 0889204934)ADAPTING THE UNITED NATIONS TO POSTMODERN ERA, 2nd ed., W. Andy Knight, ed. New York: Palgrave, 2005. 283pp, US$34.95 paper (ISBN 0333801504)The UN celebrated its 60th anniversary September 2005 with a gloomy summit short on achievements. Indeed, Canada's quest for endorsement of the responsibility to protect principle, improbably crowned by success on that occasion, was the only good surprise. Negotiations on the summit outcome document were preceded by an ill-humoured debate over security council expansion, leaving several aspirants to new permanent seats out of sorts when their gambit failed.Serious attention to Kofi Annaris recommendations, contained a thoughtful report-topically titled in larger freedom-was scant. The commendably thorough and remarkably consensual conclusions of Annan's high-level panel on threats, challenges, and change, A more secure world: Our shared responsibility, released December 2004, were much admired, but little read. Few realized that one of its recommendations was to address the problem of international crime as a serious security threat. The report also contained key elements for a consensus on the definition of terrorism that had so long eluded the UN (endorsed by Amr Moussa, secretary general of the Arab League, a panel member). Incredibly, the summit flubbed any serious treatment of both terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. UN delegates ignored their own many failures serenely, as ever.The three volumes reviewed here address the United Nations and its current travails a variety of ways. Courtney B. Smith, a dean the John C. Whitehead School of Diplomacy and International Relations of Seton Hall University, sets herself the ambitious task of surveying the UN's principal political groupings of states, decision-making organs, mode of diplomacy, and resulting outcomes. Paul Heinbecker-a recent Canadian ambassador to the UN-and Patricia Goff offer an edited volume of papers and remarks drawn from a conference on UN reform at the striking new Centre on International Governance Innovation (CIGI) headquarters Waterloo and co-sponsored by Wilfrid Laurier University. Andy Knight returns to an earlier set of essays on the UN, updating the volume four years later to encompass recent developments the reform agenda and the political backdrop thereto.Smith's book, involving significant research and analysis, deserves the most attention. It is a single-author effort, resulting authorial coherence. Smith is an admirably clear, jargon-free writer. In seeking to cover the UN, she develops an approach deriving from earlier research models but adapted to recent trends. She leaves aside the thriving, competitive, often exasperatingly self-regarding world of UN agencies, funds, and programs to focus on central UN organs: the general assembly, the security council, the sadly ineffective economic and social council and the secretary general. She does this by examining how delegates work, how formal and informal groups coalesce at the UN and what roles nongovernmental actors-including large, generally international companies-play and why. second section of the book looks at decision-making, institutional interactions, and the importance of individual personalities at the UN, the latter a particularly welcome perspective much overlooked by scholars quest of systemic answers.Smith is not shy of focusing on process considerations her penultimate chapter. Procedures, as lawyers know, often facilitate solutions (not least by calming emotional fever-from which states often suffer at the UN) and sometimes constitute solutions and of themselves. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesÉtudes des sciences et des technologies
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,698
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,005
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,325
Écart entre enseignants0,317 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInternational Journal Canada s Journal of Global Policy AnalysisMême sujetGlobal Peace and Security DynamicsTravaux en français237 207