MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2316735537 · doi:10.1097/01.jaa.0000443808.97164.cb

Physician assistants in Canada

2014· article· en· W2316735537 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Ian W. Jones, Natalie St-Pierre

Notice bibliographique

RevueJAAPA · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueNursing Roles and Practices
Établissements canadiensCanadian Women's Health Network
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésJurisdictionDelegateStatuteHealth carePublic administrationLicensePolitical scienceGeographyLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FigureFigureCanada is a confederation comprising 10 provinces and 3 territories. Each jurisdiction has authority to establish parameters concerning the administration and regulation of its health professionals, including physician assistants (PAs). In addition, each province or territory has its own health system; separate systems also exist for federal employees such as Canadian Forces members and for statutorily mandated obligations such as with our First Nations Aboriginal people. Four provinces have formal statutes that allow PAs to practice. PAs working in these provinces are granted permission to practice by way of their respective Medical Act, which stipulates that a physician can delegate to qualified individuals. Of the four jurisdictions, Manitoba and New Brunswick regulate practice and license for PAs through their Colleges of Physicians and Surgeons (medical boards). Alberta has a voluntary registry and is considering regulation. Ontario uses the delegated authority provision to authorize PAs to practice. Some PAs are working outside the public healthcare system in occupational settings in the Northwest Territories and in other provinces under similar clauses or allowances. Discussions regarding the introduction of PAs are occurring at many levels with stakeholders in British Columbia, Nova Scotia, Prince Edward Island, Newfoundland and Labrador, and Quebec. Physicians, governments, and medically affiliated organizations in these provinces have expressed interest in integrating PAs into their respective health systems but have not yet committed to the concept. The history of Canada's PAs has origins with sick-berth attendants working in the Royal Canadian Navy in the 1900s and in other services throughout the 20th century. In 1984, the Canadian Armed Forces adopted this model and labeled these advanced trained medics as PAs. These senior-level medical personnel provided primary care to armed forces members and in some cases to civilians in remote operations and on military missions. The Canadian civilian world began to formally recognize the PA role first in Manitoba in 1999, with a formal homegrown education program that commenced in 2008. The Canadian Association of Physician Assistants is a national organization that represents PAs across Canada (Table 1). The association advocates at the provincial, territorial, and federal levels for the advancement of the profession. It provides a unified voice, technical expertise, and a wide range of member services including professional development resources for the profession and practice insurance. The Physician Assistant Certification Council of Canada (PACCC) administers and oversees certification for PAs in Canada. The PACCC is a council of the association whose mandate is the delivery and administration of certification and quality assurance for the entry to practice certification examination. The Certified Canadian Physician Assistant (CCPA) designation is recognized as the national standard. Canadian certification is not a requirement for practice in all provinces; however, most employers deem it a requirement for employment.TABLE 1: Canadian Association of Physician Assistants membership as of September 27, 2013Accreditation of the four PA education programs is provided through the Canadian Medical Association's Conjoint Accreditation Services. The three civilian university programs are two undergraduate programs in Ontario (McMaster University and the Consortium for PA Education) and a master's degree program at the University of Manitoba. The Canadian Forces PA program is restricted to serving members and grants a degree in collaboration with the University of Nebraska Medical Center. All programs are 24 to 25 months in duration and deliver curricula that support the Canadian PA association's scope of practice and national competency profile for PAs. The number of program seats is determined by the provincial government. More than 400 PAs are practicing across Canada. Although this is a relatively small number in comparison to our respective US colleagues, the growth is remarkable considering that only one PA was working in Canada in a civilian setting in 2004 and the first non-military graduates were in 2010. Many have started to see the value that these health professionals bring to the healthcare system, thus helping to address health professional shortage challenges across the country and improving access to care for patients. With the profession only recently being introduced to the public system in Alberta and other provinces starting to express interest, one could believe that the profession is on the cusp of rapid growth in Canada. Canada's PAs are seeing a slow but consistent increase in opportunities. The demand exceeds the supply of PAs, although it appears the question of fee-for-service economics in our single-bursar government-funded systems has restricted the expansion. Programs that receive block funding (for example, academic specialty groups in provinces such as Manitoba and Ontario) support PA recruitment as service demands increase or shift from postgraduate residents. Many innovators and early adopters of change support the concept; however, with minimal research on PAs and their economics in Canada, the arguments for the integration of these professionals is more based on common sense and intuition than empiric data. The restriction and slow expansion into fee-for-service primary care practices is limited. The question is who pays and who controls the expenditure.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,367
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,289

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,030
Tête enseignante GPT0,383
Écart entre enseignants0,353 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations14
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJAAPAMême sujetNursing Roles and PracticesTravaux en français237 207