Review: Maintenir La Paix En Zones Postconflit Les Nouveaux Visages De La Police
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
MAINTENIR LA PAIX EN ZONES POSTCONFLIT Les nouveaux visages de la police Samuel Tanner and Benoit Dupont, eds. Montreal: Presses de l'Universite de Montreal, 2012. 300 pp., $34.95 (paper) ISBN 978-2760627819In their edited volume Maintenir la paix en zones postconflit: les nouveaux visages de la police, Samuel Tanner and Benoit Dupont explore the ways in which police officers deployed in international peace operations negotiate and operationalize their mandate in the field (29). The authors argue that international police missions now play an essential role in the reestablishment of peace and order in post-conflict settings, contributing directly to the construction of accountable and responsible security institutions. These missions also support the reestablishment of security and order in the aftermath of armed conflict.Yet several pitfalls threaten the contribution of police to international peace-building. First, there is an important gap between the traditional police function in peaceful, developed societies and the police mandate in international peace missions. Building trust, transposing expertise, and diffusing knowledge on best practices present important challenges for foreign police forces. Second, international police missions are affected by the same issues that affect broader peace operations. The lack of coherence and coordination among donors tends to muddy the definition of the police mission's objectives and operations on the ground. The leadership of international police missions influences the mission's priorities and the strategies adopted to achieve its objectives. Third, there is the question of the suitability of practices involved in the preparation for deployment and the reintegration of police officers upon their return from international peace missions. Currently, these pitfalls limit the contribution of police officers abroad, as well as their ability to apply their experiences and new competencies on their return.The chapters in this volume cover three main themes. First, they offer an overview of national and regional deployment mechanisms and the rationale behind national participation. Individual chapters focus on police forces from the European Union, parts of Latin America, Canada, the United States, and Australia, and discuss the problems these forces encounter in the field as components of international peace operations. For example, Francis Pakyaf discusses the problems with coordination and coherence that have hindered broad security reform in Afghanistan by inhibiting Afghanistan's national police force. He highlights the ways in which the NATO training mission and the EU police mission in Afghanistan adopted contradictory strategies. While NATO focused on counter-insurgency and rapid capacity building to control the territory, the EU supported the professionalization of the police through extended training at the police academy of Kabul. Nathalie Duelos presents the power struggles that have opposed France and the US in the reform of the Kosovo Police Service (KSP). Disagreements between France and the US regarding the selection of policemen, the administration of the KSP, and policing procedures undermined the coherence and quality of training offered to the local police, and ultimately the professionalization of the KSP.Several contributors emphasize that levels of professionalism and competence vary greatly from one national police contingent to another. These differences influence local trust in the international mission and its personnel, as well as the quality of training and the perceived success and progress of the mission. While international police missions initially focused on training and equipping the new local police, generally, their mandate and its operationalization have evolved towards more complex objectives: building trust, reinforcing security institutions, maintaining order, supporting the local police in the conduct of their operations, and even standing in for local police when the mission has an executive mandate. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,005 | 0,008 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,004 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,012 | 0,002 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».