Notice bibliographique
Résumé
With this issue Volume 17(4), we have reached an important milestone. When the Canadian Council for Small Business and Entrepreneurship/Conseil canadien des PME et de l'entrepreneuriat (CCSBE/CCPME), acquired ownership of the Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (JSBE) and Faculty of Administration of the University of Regina undertook responsibility for publishing the journal, both did so with the understanding that journal would not be financially self-sufficient for some time, if ever. Recognizing the need for financial support, and the fact application for funding to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Aid to Research and Transfer Journals Program (SSHRC-ARTJ) could not be made for three years, the Faculty of Administration of the University of Regina agreed to provide up the substantial operating funds for fiscal years ending in 2003, 2004 & 2005. In July of 2004, an application for funding was made to the SSHRC-ARTJ program. By the time this issue is in readers' hands we will know the outcome of this application. With short term funding secured, plans were developed and implemented for 2003, 2004 and 2005. The objectives were largely operational including (1) the transfer of ownership and the development of administrative structures to handle subscription and publication issues, (2) the securing of a copy-editor/printer, (3) the redesign of the journal-size, cover, and format, (4) the creation of a journal web page, (5) the revision of the guidelines to authors, (6) the development of completely electronic paper submission, review, revision, and copy-editing process, (7) the rebuilding of the editorial review board with renowned Canadian and international scholars, and (8) most critically, the increase in the number and quality of paper submissions to support a return to publishing 4 issues per year. With the publication of Issue 17 (4), all of these objectives have been met. In particular, we have been successful in our objective of increasing the number and quality of submissions. Even with our current rejection rate that is in excess of 50%, we will have more than sufficient papers to publish 4 volumes per year. Therefore, beginning in 2005 with Volume 18 Issues 1-4, the JSBE will be published in January, April, July, and October. Further, because the response from authors has been so positive, rather than reject otherwise good papers because of lack of space, we have increased the number of full-length articles per issue from 4 to 5 beginning with issue 17 (3). In an ongoing effort to be relevant to all the constituent members of CCSBE/CCPME and our other readers, beginning with this issue we have added a new section to the journal. This section will consist of an article directed to practitioners. It will attempt to render a particular academic and/or theoretical topic useful in an applied sense. One exciting aspect of this section is that it is being done in partnership with the Small Enterprise Research (SER). SER is the journal of CCSBE/CCPME's sister organization the Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ). A description of the new section (Anderson, Gibson and Hindle) and the first such article presenting a five-step approach to applying state of the art theoretical material on opportunity identification in the real world (Hindle), appear next in the journal. We have been successful in creating a highly qualified and effective Editorial Review Board. Among the members are the top entrepreneurship scholars in Canada and world-class international scholars. The members of the editorial review board are committed to producing a top quality journal; and the results show this. In early 2004, the JSBE was reviewed by the Journal of Economic Literature and found of to be of sufficiently high standard to be included in the EconLit index. The JSBE is also under review for inclusion in the equally prestigious Social Sciences Citation Index. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,059 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,005 | 0,004 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,008 |
| Science ouverte | 0,007 | 0,004 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,040 | 0,043 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,035 | 0,032 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».