MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W231699471

Comment from the Managing Editor

2004· article· en· W231699471 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Robert B. Anderson

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiquePublishing and Scholarly Communication
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMilestoneEntrepreneurshipPublishingLibrary scienceAdministration (probate law)Small businessManagementPolitical scienceBusinessPublic relationsComputer scienceFinanceEconomicsHistoryLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

With this issue Volume 17(4), we have reached an important milestone. When the Canadian Council for Small Business and Entrepreneurship/Conseil canadien des PME et de l'entrepreneuriat (CCSBE/CCPME), acquired ownership of the Journal of Small Business and Entrepreneurship (JSBE) and Faculty of Administration of the University of Regina undertook responsibility for publishing the journal, both did so with the understanding that journal would not be financially self-sufficient for some time, if ever. Recognizing the need for financial support, and the fact application for funding to the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council Aid to Research and Transfer Journals Program (SSHRC-ARTJ) could not be made for three years, the Faculty of Administration of the University of Regina agreed to provide up the substantial operating funds for fiscal years ending in 2003, 2004 & 2005. In July of 2004, an application for funding was made to the SSHRC-ARTJ program. By the time this issue is in readers' hands we will know the outcome of this application. With short term funding secured, plans were developed and implemented for 2003, 2004 and 2005. The objectives were largely operational including (1) the transfer of ownership and the development of administrative structures to handle subscription and publication issues, (2) the securing of a copy-editor/printer, (3) the redesign of the journal-size, cover, and format, (4) the creation of a journal web page, (5) the revision of the guidelines to authors, (6) the development of completely electronic paper submission, review, revision, and copy-editing process, (7) the rebuilding of the editorial review board with renowned Canadian and international scholars, and (8) most critically, the increase in the number and quality of paper submissions to support a return to publishing 4 issues per year. With the publication of Issue 17 (4), all of these objectives have been met. In particular, we have been successful in our objective of increasing the number and quality of submissions. Even with our current rejection rate that is in excess of 50%, we will have more than sufficient papers to publish 4 volumes per year. Therefore, beginning in 2005 with Volume 18 Issues 1-4, the JSBE will be published in January, April, July, and October. Further, because the response from authors has been so positive, rather than reject otherwise good papers because of lack of space, we have increased the number of full-length articles per issue from 4 to 5 beginning with issue 17 (3). In an ongoing effort to be relevant to all the constituent members of CCSBE/CCPME and our other readers, beginning with this issue we have added a new section to the journal. This section will consist of an article directed to practitioners. It will attempt to render a particular academic and/or theoretical topic useful in an applied sense. One exciting aspect of this section is that it is being done in partnership with the Small Enterprise Research (SER). SER is the journal of CCSBE/CCPME's sister organization the Small Enterprise Association of Australia and New Zealand (SEAANZ). A description of the new section (Anderson, Gibson and Hindle) and the first such article presenting a five-step approach to applying state of the art theoretical material on opportunity identification in the real world (Hindle), appear next in the journal. We have been successful in creating a highly qualified and effective Editorial Review Board. Among the members are the top entrepreneurship scholars in Canada and world-class international scholars. The members of the editorial review board are committed to producing a top quality journal; and the results show this. In early 2004, the JSBE was reviewed by the Journal of Economic Literature and found of to be of sufficiently high standard to be included in the EconLit index. The JSBE is also under review for inclusion in the equally prestigious Social Sciences Citation Index. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCommunication savante
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,550
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,046
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,177 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2004
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of Small Business & EntrepreneurshipMême sujetPublishing and Scholarly CommunicationTravaux en français237 207