P-191 YI Lack of Association of Genetic Markers with Progression of Crohnʼs Disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
While progress has been made in the identification of Crohn's disease (CD) susceptibility loci, efforts to identify a genetic basis for disease progression have been less fruitful. The specific aim of this study was to build upon the major genetic advances made in IBD and to apply genome wide technologies toward predicting disease progression in CD. 1495 CD cases from 3 large IBD centers were reviewed by experienced phenotypers. Clinical and demographic details were collected, focusing on the time to first disease progression. Cases were defined as having either an indolent or progressive phenotype. Those who developed stricturing or penetrating disease within 5 years of diagnosis or who required abdominal surgery within 5 years or who required a biologic within 5 years of diagnosis were classified as having progressive disease. Genotyping was performed on 3 different platforms. Imputation was then conducted on the genotypic data using 1000 Genomes Phase 1 Integrated (March 2012) imputation panel by IMPUTE V2 after per chip QC. All 3 datasets were merged and minor allele frequencies <0.01 were then removed. Genome wide association (GWA) analysis was carried out on 3 clinical outcomes: (1) time to disease progression from inflammatory (B1) to stricturing (B2) or penetrating disease (B3), (2) time to first abdominal surgery, and (3) a binary analysis of indolent versus progressive disease. Cox-proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were used for the analyses. P < 10−8 was considered the threshold for genome wide significance. Time to disease progression. The median time to disease progression from B1 to B2/B3 behavior was 16.3 years (95% CI 13.8–18.9). Six hundred sixty-two cases were included, after QC and exclusion of any cases with B2/B3 behavior at baseline (n = 450), in the GWA analysis to determine any genetic variation associated with the time to disease progression. No SNP association reached genome wide significance in this survival analysis. Next we performed a targeted analysis to determine the association between time to disease progression and known IBD susceptibility SNPs. Six susceptibility SNPs were found to be associated with the time to disease progression, (P < 0.05). (Table1). Time to abdominal surgery Median time to abdominal surgery was 10.5 years (95% CI 9.5–11.4). 1360 cases were included after QC. Once again no SNP association reached genome wide significance; however, 8 known IBD susceptibility SNPs were found to be associated with the time to abdominal surgery, (P < 0.05). (Table1). Indolent versus Progressive disease. Seven hundred one cases were defined as having progressive disease and 562 indolent disease. Regression modeling was performed, analyzing the association between SNPs and the binary outcome. No SNP association reached genome wide significance. Four IBD susceptibility SNPs were associated with progressive disease and 1 with indolent disease, P < 0.05. (Table1). Our GWAS failed to show any SNP-phenotype association reaching genome wide significance. It is likely that multiple variables affect disease progression, with genetic factors potentially having only a small effect size. Very large studies would be required to identify them, however, such markers may not be clinically useful for predicting disease progression.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,007 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,008 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».