Pathways: Will Wernicke's area ever be defined?
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Figure: Wernicke questioned whether there was a region in the brain where a lesion would produce a serious deficit in language comprehension without a loss of linguistic abilities. © Lippincott Williams & WilkinsLanguage processing is assumed to be based in the left inferior frontal lobe, in Broca's area, which controls language production. While Bogen and Bogen defined this area anatomically as the posterior third of the inferior frontal gyrus,1 the exact location of Wernicke's area, a section often mentioned in concert with Broca's, remains a mystery. But that's a enigma that needs solving because not understanding its function may mean missing a part of the brain vital to auditory processing.Figure: Frank E. MusiekThat general part of the cortex was first referred to as Wernicke's area following Carl Wernicke's study of stroke patients with lesions in this general area of the left posterior temporal cortex. He described them as being able to speak and hear but incapable of understanding speech.2 We now know these patients likely were not hearing correctly, or rather, were not processing sound. Wernicke categorized his findings as a linguistic problem when perhaps it should have been considered a central auditory issue. Wernicke questioned whether there was a region in the brain where a lesion will produce a serious deficit in language comprehension without a loss of linguistic abilities. Bogen and Bogen countered that with questions of their own: Because many differences in the types of aphasia could be identified, did that mean different types of aphasia exist in this area of the brain? If they did, are the lesions in different places? Is agreement possible on the location of the loci for lesions that produce different kinds of aphasia if researchers cannot agree on the identification of the various types? Is the condition really aphasia or a central auditory deficit? Wernicke's early diagram of the area has the first temporal gyrus overlapping just barely into the second gyrus. What is unclear is whether the area includes part of the second temporal gyrus located above the external ear. In the diagrams of French aphasiologists Jules Dejerine and Pierre Marie, several distinct parts of the left cerebral hemisphere were included as part of Wernicke's area, including the posterior part of the superior and middle temporal gyrus, extending to the supramarginal and angular gyri. This area includes the underlying arcuate fasciculus, the large tract of fibers that connect the superior temporal and the inferior frontal gyri. The planum temporale is sometimes considered to be part of Wernicke's area, and it has been shown to be sensitive to various types of acoustic stimulation. Geschwind and Levitsky reported that the planum temporale was larger in the left hemisphere than in the right. These investigators reasoned that if the left hemisphere was the dominant speech hemisphere and the planum temporale was in the region of Wernicke's area, then the planum temporale could be an anatomical correlate to receptive language function. Based on current research, Wernicke's area is likely to include the planum temporale and part of the superior temporal gyrus. Some functional magnetic resonance imaging demonstrates that the planum temporale is not entirely devoted to linguistic processing, however, because it also plays a role in early auditory processing. According to Johnsrude et al, several positron emission tomography studies have demonstrated that the superior temporal gyrus, anterior to the primary auditory area in both hemispheres, is activated by speech sounds compared to rest, noise bursts, or tonal stimuli. (Neuron 2002; 36(4):767-776.) Given the lack of agreement for the location of Wernicke's area, further investigation is needed. Otherwise, we may be missing a portion of the brain that is significant in auditory processing. To localize Wernicke's area, perhaps we need to define it in a different way.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».