MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2317194929 · doi:10.1542/gr.33-5-53

Fathers, Coparenting, and Breastfeeding

2015· article· en· W2317194929 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff

Notice bibliographique

RevueAAP Grand Rounds · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueBreastfeeding Practices and Influences
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBreastfeedingCoparentingMedicineIconCitationFamily medicineNursingPediatricsPsychologyDevelopmental psychologyWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Source: Abbass-Dick J, Stern SB, Nelson LE, et al. Coparenting breastfeeding support and exclusive breastfeeding: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2015; 135(1): 102– 110; doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1416Investigators from Toronto studied the effect of a coparenting breastfeeding support intervention on breastfeeding rates. Mothers were recruited from a teaching hospital within their first 2 days postpartum and were eligible if they were primiparous, ≥18 years old, English-speaking, planning to breastfeed for >12 weeks, living with a male partner who could participate in the study, and had delivered a healthy singleton infant at ≥37 weeks’ gestation. Couples were randomized to receive either usual care or a coparenting breastfeeding support intervention. Usual care consisted of standard in-hospital breastfeeding support and any breastfeeding assistance that was proactively sought in the community. The coparenting intervention included both parents and involved a 15-minute in-hospital discussion, a video, a workbook, a breastfeeding booklet, access to a secure study website, 2 follow-up emails, and 1 telephone call.The primary study outcomes were exclusive breastfeeding and continuation of breastfeeding assessed at 6 and 12 weeks postpartum. Secondary outcomes included maternal satisfaction with their partner’s involvement with breastfeeding, maternal perception of the coparenting relationship as measured by the Coparenting Relationship Scale at 12 weeks, and maternal perception of breastfeeding support from their partner as measured by the Postpartum Partner Support Scale at 6 and 12 weeks. Also, paternal breastfeeding confidence was measured by the Breastfeeding Self-Efficacy Scale at birth and 6 weeks and paternal attitude towards breastfeeding was measured by the Iowa Infant Attitude Scale at birth and 6 weeks.There were 107 couples in the control group and 107 in the intervention group. Significantly more mothers in the intervention group than the control group continued to breastfeed at 12 weeks postpartum (96% vs 88%, P = .02). There were no significant differences in breastfeeding rates at 6 weeks nor in exclusive breastfeeding rates at 6 and 12 weeks. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to maternal perception of the coparenting relationship, maternal perception of support, or paternal infant feeding attitude. Fathers in the intervention group had a significantly greater increase in breastfeeding self-efficacy scores from baseline to 6 weeks postpartum compared with fathers in the control group (P = .03). In addition, significantly more mothers in the intervention group than in the control group reported that their partners provided them with breastfeeding help in the first 6 weeks (71% vs 52%, P = .02) and that they were satisfied with their partners’ involvement with breastfeeding (89% vs 78%, P = .04).The authors conclude that including fathers in a coparenting breastfeeding support intervention may have a beneficial effect for first-time parents.Dr Noble has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device.This study confirms the importance of coparenting interventions for new parents. Coparenting aims for more cooperative and supportive teamwork between parents by teaching effective communication, problem solving, and conflict resolution. For instance, in a recently published study, a brief coparenting intervention was shown to positively affect family relationships and decrease maternal stress.1 The present study shows that a coparenting intervention may increase breastfeeding.This study also adds to the growing literature demonstrating that including fathers in breastfeeding interventions increases breastfeeding rates.2 In reality, most breastfeeding interventions are designed exclusively for mothers. Most new fathers report being ignored by or having a negative experience with postpartum nurses.3 A recent study revealed that fathers often felt helpless to support their partner, as they were excluded from antenatal breastfeeding education and postnatal support.4 Fathers wanted more information about breastfeeding to be directed towards them as well as ideas about how they could practically support their partner. Without paternal breastfeeding interventions, fathers may feel that breastfeeding excludes them and continues the exclusive relationship that the mother and infant experienced during pregnancy.A limitation of this current study is that it measured a multifaceted intervention. Therefore, it is not possible to ascertain which specific components of the intervention (ie, the discussion, video, workbook, booklet, website, emails, or telephone call) were responsible for the increased breastfeeding duration. We also cannot measure whether the improvement was related to coparenting education, breastfeeding education, or paternal involvement in breastfeeding. Nevertheless, the results of this study suggest that a relatively simple intervention combining support of coparenting and breastfeeding could be effective. If further studies confirm these results, this could be a simple but effective method to improve parenting and breastfeeding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,376
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,335

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,044
Tête enseignante GPT0,304
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAAP Grand RoundsMême sujetBreastfeeding Practices and InfluencesTravaux en français237 207