Full Injection and Immunization Authority Planned for Ontario Pharmacists
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The wheels are in motion to give Ontario pharmacists the regulatory authority to administer routine injections and immunizations, with the Ontario Pharmacists' Association (OPA) expecting several hundred pharmacists to have received training in the practice by the end of March 2012. Pharmacists were given the authority to administer injections for demonstration or education purposes in Bill 179, the 2009 legislation that expanded scope of practice in a number of areas. Disappointed that full injection authority wasn't included at the time, the OPA has been advocating for its inclusion ever since. “We've been telling the government that approving this authority would be in the public interest,” says OPA chief executive officer Dennis Darby. “Over time there has been much more data showing that pharmacists can do this. For example, British Columbia has done very well, with over 1000 of their pharmacists now trained and administering injections and vaccines.” In December 2011, the Council of the Ontario College of Pharmacists (OCP) approved a draft regulation that eliminated the restriction, paving the way for full authority to administer drugs by injection. The new registrar of the College is Marshall Moleschi, most recently the registrar of the College of Pharmacists of BC. A 60-day consultation period on the proposed new rules was to end in mid-February, after which the OCP planned to seek government approval. The OPA launched its injection and immunization certificate program in June of last year. According to Darby, it is expected that around 400 Ontario pharmacists will have completed the program by the end of March. “Our objective is to have at least 1000 pharmacists trained by fall of this year,” he says. “Provided the regulation is passed by then, that would put pharmacists in a good position to start administering the seasonal flu vaccine.” Pharmacists in BC and elsewhere have demonstrated the value they bring to the health care system when they participate in flu vaccination, says Darby. “From a public health point of view, there is a lot of added value in terms of convenience and accessibility. It's particularly important for seniors to protect themselves against influenza, and many seniors have close relationships with their pharmacist. It provides an opportunity for pharmacists to help ensure these patients get vaccinated.”
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».