Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Me Out. Written by Richard Greenberg, directed by Joe Mantello. Bagley Wright Theatre, Seattle WA. November 12, 2004. Last spring I read Richard Greenberg's play Take Me Out and was captivated. I hoped to someday get a chance to see the play performed, and not merely because of the promise of male nudity. Reading a play, no matter how well-written, cannot capture the highs and lows of comedy and drama, or the effect of pacing on either. In the same way, reading a box score or story (no matter how well-written) cannot capture the beauty of a well-turned double play, the excitement of fans screaming in unison as the runner rounds third, or the tense battle between pitcher and batter. When I saw Take Me Out it was the second game of the season at the Seattle Repertory Theater. Though the on-stage cast differed from those who had performed in the Tony award-winning Broadway production (with the exception of Gene Gabriel, an original cast member and the movement consultant), the actors in the Seattle production were up to the task. The performances of Doug Wert, as Kippy Sunderstrom, and of T. Scott Cunningham, as Mason Marzac, were especially memorable. Director Joe Mantello, who won a Tony award for Take Me Out on Broadway, along with set designer Scott Pask, costume designer Jess Goldstein, and sound designer Janet Kalas all reprised their Broadway roles. They created believable clubhouse, shower, and on-the-field scenes with a set so well designed that it never has to physically change. A plot synopsis would go something like this: star biracial baseball player announces that he is homosexual, setting in motion a particular chain of events among his fans, friends, and teammates. Professional team sports have long struggled with the idea of having homosexual teammates. Billy Bean, for example, came out only after he retired from the game, having played his career under a sort of de facto ask, don't tell policy. Any work involving unresolved issues surrounding homosexuality will necessarily touch on questions of tolerance, bigotry, and even religion. But categorizing Take Me Out as a play written solely to grapple with these issues (though important) minimizes it. It is also a story of friendship, of acknowledging and accepting who we are both privately and publicly. But most of all, it is a story of an unabashed, unadulterated love for baseball. Greenberg's play does engage in some stereotypes of its own in the sketches of the minor characters: the dumb jock (the catcher, probably the position least likely to be the dumb jock), the macho Latino ballplayers, and the too-intense Japanese pitcher. But Greenberg's main characters are more deeply, if subtly, drawn, inviting us to want to learn more about them. Even the John Rocker-like character of Shane Mungitt intrigues us as we learn about his troubled childhood and his anguished need for baseball. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,182 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle