Impassioned Virginia Loyalist and New Brunswick Pioneer: The Reverend John Agnew
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The most prominent, zealous, and active clerical loyalist in revolutionary Virginia John Agnew, rector of Suffolk Parish in Nansemond County, an ecclesiastical unit of the established Church of England.1 A neighbor declared that Agnew was the most remarkable of any Clergyman in that Colony for his early and uniform attachment to the British Government in Church and State. Another acquaintance asserted that Agnew in his power consistent with his Pastoral Function to keep his Parishioners steady in their allegiance and obedience to their lawful Sovereign. John Murray, earl of Dunmore, governor of Virginia when the Revolution began, testified that Agnew did everything consistent with his character to keep his Parishioners and Neighbours steady to their Duty and attachment to their lawful Sovereign, and to persuade them to aid and assist the cause of the British Crown and government.2 His impassioned support of the royal cause led to his imprisonment by the Virginians. After his release he became chaplain to a loyalist military corps, and later the French captured him on the high sea and held him captive in several locations until the end of the war. Dunmore thought his experiences were so singular and adventurous that he should publish an account of them.3 After Great Britain conceded independence to the United States, Agnew settled in New Brunswick, where he accumulated large land holdings. Historians agree that the loyalists constituted an important component in the revolutionary generation in colonial America and that they merit scholarly attention. This article will analyze Agnew's clerical career, his revolutionary experiences, and his days as pioneer in New Brunswick. Agnew is not unknown to students of the Revolution, but an inclusive, integrated biographical sketch of him has heretofore not appeared in print. From the date of his death and the age he attained it can be inferred that Agnew born in 1727. Records of the University of Glasgow note that a John Agnew, evidently the future parson, matriculated in 1744 and identify him as the son of Jacob Agnew of Kirmanock, Galloway, Scotland. Presumably he took his baccalaureate degree about 1748 and, as he stated to British officials, went to Virginia in 1751 and soon settled in Nansemond County. He offered no information about his birth, parentage, background, or experiences in Great Britain prior to that date. James Agnew, very probably our subject's brother, a merchant in Portsmouth, Virginia and also a loyalist who identified himself as a native of Galloway.4 John Agnew represented James Agnew before the loyalist claims commissioners in London in 1783. How Agnew occupied himself for the first two years in Virginia is not definitely known, but possibly he conducted a school. His keeping a school for several years at his rectory after his ordination seems to support this assumption. Not long after arriving in Nansemond he declared himself a candidate for holy orders in the Church of England and prepared himself by private study. Since there no bishop in America, an ordinand obliged to hazard a voyage to England to seek investment at the hands of the bishop of London, the nominal diocesan of the colonial churches. To the bishop an aspiring minister to present testimonials from local clergymen, the bishop's commissary in the colony, and the governor; he also to have a title, a promise of clerical employment after ordination. Often these credentials contain valuable biographical information about the candidate, but Agnew's materials have apparently not survived.5 The bishop of London ordained Agnew deacon on 11 June 1753 and priest on 17 June. On the latter day he also granted him a license to officiate in Virginia and soon thereafter the new priest returned to the Old Dominion. Ordination meant that Agnew had met the Anglican standards of character, orthodoxy, and knowledge, and had taken the oaths of allegiance and canonical obedience to the king and to the Church of England. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».