TOUCH® PRO Study: The Impact of Natalizumab on Utilization of Healthcare Resources by the Patients and Their Associated Treatment Satisfaction
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Natalizumab (NAT) is an integrin receptor antagonist indicated for inducing and maintaining clinical response and remission in adult patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease with evidence of inflammation who have had an inadequate response to, or are unable to tolerate, conventional CD therapies and inhibitors of TNF-α. The study sample was comprised of patients enrolled in the TYSABRI Outreach: Unified Commitment to Health (TOUCH®) prescribing program that were apprised of the project and agreed to study participation. CD patients completed online or phone surveys regarding their prior biologic history, steroid use, complications over the past 3 months and healthcare utilization. Patients also completed the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medicines (TSQM) which measures their satisfaction with treatment effectiveness, side-effects and convenience, and global treatment satisfaction. Data were collected prior to the initiation of NAT therapy and at month 3 of treatment. To date, 61 patients have provided baseline data. Females comprised 61% of the sample, with a mean age of 42 years and mean time from diagnosis of 13 years. Ninety-two percent of the patients reported prior biologic use, 87% had used infliximab; 66% had used adalimumab and 21% had used certolizumab. Overall, 23% of patients had used one anti-TNF, while 56% had used 2 anti-TNFs and 13% had used all 3 anti-TNFs. Sixty-five percent of patients reported steroid use in the past 3 months prior to baseline, and during this same time, the mean number of hospital admissions was 0.8, mean days in hospital was 6.4, the mean number of emergency room (ER) visits due to CD was 1.3, and mean days of total parenteral nutrition was 6.3. Among the 24 patients providing month 3 data, there was a significant decrease in the number of CD-related ER visits (1.3 vs. 0.7, P = 0.032) and the percent of patients with CD-related complications (abscess, fistula, ostomy, obstruction (50% vs. 41%)). Significant improvements were observed in each of the four scales of the TSQM at follow-up (Effectiveness Scale 28.6 vs. 63.0, P < 0.001; Side-effects Scale 61.6 vs. 82.2, P = 0.01, Convenience Scale 63.8 vs. 70.8, P = 0.05; Global Satisfaction Scale 41.3 vs. 67.0, P < 0.001). CD patients who have failed conventional therapy and at least one anti-TNF therapy report substantial resource utilization in a three month period of time. Although there are limitations due to patient drop-out, the followup from many of these patients demonstrates significant improvement, suggesting the ability of NAT to reduce resource utilization. Further study of patient subtypes most likely to benefit in this manner is warranted.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».