Optimization of Cyclic Steam Stimulation (CSS) Under Geomechanics-Dependent Permeability
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Objectives/Scope: Since its accidental discovery in Venezuela during a steamflood procedure, and despite the high costs associated with using steam. CSS has been widely used throughout the world in heavy-oil reservoirs, especially in Alberta, California, and Venezuela. It has turned out that it is also important to understand the degree of impact of geomechanics as it is a key parameter in reservoirs with geomechanical response. This makes the optimization process more valuable in terms of the application of crucial operational constraints and parameters, such as injection rate, cycle size, cycle life, and well spacing, not only for the reservoir but also the wellbore, which are important for delivering steam to the subsurface while ensuring minimum heat loss along with reservoir integrity and permeability variation. Methods, Procedures, Process The CSS recovery method is influenced by complex reservoir geologies, where a CSS well can penetrate multiple layers having significantly different properties, including permeability. It is important to have a solid understanding of the impact of multiple layers on recovery when using CSS, not only to help maximize recovery but also net-present value because of the high cost of steam generation. In this study, a commercial full-physics reservoir simulator is used to simulate the effect of multiple layers with varying permeabilities under different operating conditions. Results, Observations, Conclusions CSS helps to increase recoveries up to 20 to 25% by means of certain mechanisms, including but not limited to viscosity reduction thermal expansion of oil, blocking removal, and gravity drainage. Although it is generally valid that higher steam qualities and shorter soak times provide higher recoveries, the main stages of cyclic steam stimulation (CSS)—injection, soaking, and production—should be carefully optimized because the efficiency of this technique is reduced after the first few cycles. The influence of geomechanics turns out to be a significant parameter in this process. Novel/Additive Information The results and sensitivities are compared and discussed in light of a comprehensive literature review of CSS with different process optimization methods, including sequential CSS and cumulative average daily profit methods. The significance of all major parameters are outlined using tornado charts to serve as a practical example for optimization of similar future applications.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle