HUMAN PANCREATIC ISLET TRANSPLANTATION IN INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATION WITH A DISTANT ISLET ISOLATION CENTER: PRELIMINARY RESULTS FROM THE BUDAPEST-GENEVA EXPERIENCE
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
P448 Aims: Although, recent developments in clinical islet transplantation led to insulin independence in several patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, isolation of a large number of high-quality human islets for transplantation still remains a great challenge. To overcome the critical islet processing and to ensure patient safety and quality care, we have established an international collaboration between two geographically distant transplant centers. Methods: All pancreata were harvested from multiorgan cadaveric donors in Hungary and were procured by the same team. Careful attention was paid to pancreas harvesting, using no-touch technique and rapid preparation. The pancreata were immediately preserved by the two-layer method (oxigenated perfluorocarbon+UW) and subsequently transported by scheduled regular flight for isolation to Cell Isolation and Transplantation Center, Geneva University Hospitals which is situated at a distance of 1400 km from Budapest. Islets were isolated after enzymatic ductal perfusion of the pancreas using the automated method. After purification, the islets were cultured overnight, then transported back to Budapest also with a scheduled flight. Upon arrival the islets were assessed for viability. Two consecutive kidney transplant patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus, from our IAK waiting list, underwent islet transplantation via percutaneous transhepatic portal embolization using the “bag-method”. The immunosuppression followed the Edmonton-protocol and consisted of daclizumab, sirolimus and low-dose tacrolimus. Results: Median donor age was 44 years (35-54), mean BMI: 25.6. The average time from donor aortic cross-clamp to pancreas procurement was 23 minutes. The islet isolation process began within 8 hours from the donor aorta cross-clamp in all cases. The isolation success rate was 75% (3/4). After overnight culture, the islets were transported back to Budapest and assessed for viability which was >80% in all cases. No complications have occurred during the transplantation, the portal pressure remained within the normal range. The first patient has received 12 000IE/BW from two donors and insulin requirement decreased from 40U/day to 10U/day. The second patient has received 7200IE/BW from single donor and became immediately insulin free. Posttransplantation follow-up for these two patients are 3 and 1 months, respectively. Both patients achieved metabolic stability, the mean glycosylated hemoglobin values have been reduced, none of them have had a hyper- or hypoglycemic episode since islet transplantation. Conclusions: The experience of a traditional islet transplant center, possessing the advanced pancreatic islet isolation techniques, combined with strict donor and recipient selection criteria, suitable organ harvesting and recipient management could overcome national borders and could result in an excellent international collaboration. These preliminary results demonstrate the feasibility of an international collaborative islet transplantation program at a distance over 1000 km.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».