Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Myron Nevins, DDS: The success and predictability of the science of osseointegration has had a global impact on dental treatment planning. P.-I. Brånemarks 1984 presentation in Toronto opened the door to a new thought process that has influenced everyday decisions in patient care. My introduction to dental implants in 1966 was with subperiosteal implants that were mainly effective for atrophic edentulous mandibles. This era also included blade implants, but these implants were found to have a significant lack of predictability. In the mid-1980s, implant practitioners began to expand beyond treating edentulous patients to include partially dentate individuals. Someone with a single missing tooth could have a single restoration without depreciating the structure of adjacent teeth. It was immediately apparent that partial restorations could not display titanium abutments such as those that were acceptable for mandibular edentulism. This necessitated innovative approaches and resulted in customized abutments to bring about results simulating fixed restorative dentistry. Patient acceptance and satisfaction were immediately enhanced. Two significant detriments to patient care remained. The first was the 3- to 6-month waiting period between implant placement and delivery of the final prosthesis. A publication by Lazzara demonstrating success with an implant placed in an extraction socket played a significant role in legitimizing a shorter treatment regime. Today many patients are restored with provisional and sometimes permanent restorations delivered simultaneously with implant placement. Free-hand surgery has been supplemented by computer-guided implant placement. A second detriment was the lack of alveolar process and the presence of anatomical obstacles such as the inferior alveolar nerve and maxillary sinus. The 1990s ushered in a rapid progression of surgical procedures with the use of biologics to construct bone that would successfully support occlusal loads. This was further augmented by the introduction of growth factors at the beginning of the 21st century. The understanding of the role played by the implant surface became more and more sophisticated. This has improved success in challenging situations and resulted in developments in which rougher surfaces can be used more apically and smoother surfaces more occlusally. In the future, I fully expect to see a steady stream of additional breakthroughs and improvements involving implants, abutments, impression techniques, and restorative materials that will be a segue for continued success. This special supplemental issue reports on a number of recent developments aiming to make implant treatment safer, more effective, and enduringly esthetic. I truly expect the best is yet to be.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,015 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,008 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,009 | 0,012 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,020 | 0,008 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».