Geology and petrography of the Wellington Seam, Nanaimo Coalfield, Vancouver Island
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The Wellington Seam in the Nanaimo Coalfield of Vancouver Island has contributed significantly to British Columbia's coal production since its discovery in 1871. Difficult geological conditions and conflicts between surface land use and mining activities have hampered the efficient development of coal mines in the Wellington Seam. This study contributes to the assessment of the coal resources of the Nanaimo Coalfield by describing the geology, quality, petrographic composition and depositional origin of the Wellington Seam. Surface geological mapping of the western half of the Nanaimo Coalfield was done at scales of 1:6000 to 1:20,000. Detailed mapping of the Wellington Seam was done in the underground workings of Wolf Mountain Colliery. 229 stratigraphic sections were measured, and three columnar samples of coal and associated mudstone partings within the Wellington Seam were collected in the mine. Five coal and three mudstone lithotypes were recognized in the columnar samples. The petrographic composition of the coals and mudstones was determined by point-counting at high magnification under incident light in immersion oil. Moisture and ash content, and free swelling index were determined for the coals and mudstones. Seven formations and nine members, comprising the basal half of the Upper Cretaceous Nanaimo Group, crop out and are present in boreholes and mine shafts within the study area. Formations and members are distinguished on the basis of lithostratigraphy. Coal is present within five lithostratigraphic units: the Northfield and Millstream Members of the Extension Formation, the Cranberry and Newcastle Members of the Pender Formation, and the Reserve Member of the Protection Formation. The Wellington Seam is a composite of up to three closely-associated coal beds near the base of the Northfield Member. Coal of the Wellington Seam is typically bright banded, blocky and very hard. The dry ash content of the coal is seldom less than 5 percent, and is usually over 9 percent. Its sulphur content is usually between 0.5 and 1 percent, and rarely exceeds 1.5 percent. The low sulphur content of the Wellington coal suggests that its precursor peat was generally not in contact with sulphur-rich marine or brackish water. Sandstones of the East Wellington Formation, underlying the Wellington Seam, were deposited on the shoreface of a northwest-prograding strandplain, fed by sand-dominated distributaries. Most of the Wellington coals sampled at Wolf Mountain originated as wet forest swamp peats, and less commonly as fen peats or marsh peats. Mudstone and siltstone partings within the Wellington Seam were deposited as overbank flood deposits, crevasse splays and levee deposits associated with stream channels. Siltstones, mudstones and coals of the Northfield Member, overlying the Wellington Seam, probably originated as overbank flood, crevasse splay and swamp deposits. Isolated sandstones and conglomerates within the Northfield Member may have been deposited by anastomosing streams. Conglomerates and sandstones of the Millstream Member, overlying and locally truncating the Northfield Member, represent deposits of gravel bed rivers, probably part of a coastal braid plain delta. Mining of the Wellington Seam has been hampered by the irregular topography of the seam floor, splits within the seam, and minor faulting and clastic dikes within the seam roof. Most of the topographic irregularities of the seam floor are of sedimentary rather than tectonic origin. Detailed mapping at Wolf Mountain shows that the position and extent of seam splits and perhaps some of the irregularities of the seam floor are controlled by syndepositional faults. Recognition of the controls of seam splits and floor structures affords the possibility of geological forecasting in advance of mining. Petrographic composition of the Wellington Seam can be partially correlated with coal lithotypes. Lustrous coals and dull and bright coals have very high vitrinite contents and low inertinite contents. Bright banded and bright coals have lower vitrinite contents and higher inertinite contents, but still consist predominantly of vitrinite. All of the Wellington coals sampled at Wolf Mountain have very low liptinite contents. Free swelling indices of the Wellington coals at Wolf Mountain are generally less than 3, indicating that the coals are not strongly agglomerating. Very few of the coal samples from Wolf Mountain have free swelling index values greater than 4. There is no clear relationship between ash content and free swelling index of the coals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».