MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2320627727 · doi:10.1097/tp.0000000000000311

Hydrogen in Lung Reconditioning—More Than Just Inflation

2014· letter· en· W2320627727 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
John H. Dark

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransplantation · 2014
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrgan Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLungOrgan donationMedicineTransplantationPerfusionLung transplantationCirculatory systemIntensive care medicineSurgeryInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Organ perfusion, with us since the days of Carrel and Lindbergh, is coming into vogue across all of transplantation. As we expand the use of organs from donation after cardio-circulatory death donors, and increasingly appreciate the scope for damage after brain stem death, perfusion of isolated organs is being seen as a solution to some of the problems of both organ number and quality. The lung has lead the way, perhaps not only because it is vulnerability to the sequelae of brain death (1) but also because of its unique suitability to donation after circulatory death. Cellular metabolism of the lung can be maintained by simple inflation, in the absence of a circulation, probably for several hours (2). So ischemia is less an issue than assessment of function. In a life-supporting organ, reliable assessment is crucial. Ex vivo lung perfusion (EVLP) was introduced by Steen et al. (3) specifically for DCD lung assessment—his first case involved a Maastricht category ll donor and had excellent function after lung quality could be measured in an objective fashion. Subsequently, it was realized by the group in Lund, then workers in Toronto and finally in centers around the world, that EVLP was also a vehicle to improve, or recondition, lungs initially below the standard needed for primary transplantation (4). The most important step was that of Steen demonstrating, in contrast to previous experience, that endothelial integrity could be maintained. Key ingredients were the absence of white cells, platelets, and complement, a hyperosmolar solution and a perfusion approach which minimized shear stress. So great was the difference from the previous experience of inevitable and progressive pulmonary edema that it has been widely assumed that the circuit did no harm at all to the lung. However, this is a naive view—as the landmark study by Noda and colleagues from the University of Pittsburgh has demonstrated. Using a rat model, they showed that EVLP was associated with a proinflammatory environment. They went on to demonstrate that inhaled hydrogen would ameliorate this state, and the effect translated into better function after transplant of the lungs, and a strikingly low inflammatory cell infiltrate in those transplants. The effects of hydrogen as an antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, and antiapoptotic agent are only just now being realized, and this is the first study of the molecule in EVLP. There were additional effects on the levels of lactate which are more difficult to explain. Glucose metabolism in the lung produces lactate, which is then consumed, in the intact animal, by muscle, kidney, and liver. In the artificial setting of isolated lung perfusion, lactate accumulates just as glucose disappears. Although it generates metabolic acidosis, and high lactate has theoretical disadvantageous effects on some aspects of neutrophil function, studies such as those by Koike at al. in Toronto have shown no bad effect on the lung (5). However, hydrogen is clearly having some effect at mitochondrial level, perhaps through the heme-oxygenase-1 pathway. That this is of potential real benefit, regardless of mechanism, is shown by improved adenosine triphospate levels in the lungs exposed to hydrogen. It is a pity that lactate-to-pyruvate ratios, a simple way of looking at some aspects of lactate production, were not measured. The lung has huge advantages, in that the beneficial agent, hydrogen here, can be delivered easily. There are other agents, including nitric oxide and carbon monoxide which have similar although perhaps not so all-encompassing effects, and comparisons are clearly needed. However, the key molecule can be delivered by other routes. The Pittsburgh group has shown an advantage to experimental cardiac grafts just by putting hydrogen in drinking water (6). Hydrogen sulphide, inhaled or given intraperitoneally as its sodium salt, has similar beneficial effects in endotoxin, oxygen-induced, ventilator-induced, or smoke-induced lung injury. Systemically, it is a free-radical scavenger, upregulates heme-oxygenase-1 gene expression and protects the heart through activation of endothelial K+-ATPase channels (7). This article takes us a step further in reducing lung injury before transplantation. It shows us that modifying how we do EVLP with good lungs has benefits, which can in all probability be translated into what we do with the predamaged lungs we take from donors. However, by illustrating the potential for manipulation during normothermic perfusion, it shows a potential route to improving all organs, not just those we can inflate, and so it is a benefit across the transplant spectrum.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,003
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0020,003
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,020
Tête enseignante GPT0,291
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransplantationMême sujetOrgan Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207