MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2320729463 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000310384.88247.39

Integrative Cancer Therapy

2007· article· en· W2320729463 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Brande Victorian

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCancer Treatment and Pharmacology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCancerMedicinePsychotherapistPsychologyInternal medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Patient safety with herbal drug interactions and symptom management are two key areas of integrative cancer therapy where researchers and clinicians are putting in a great deal of effort. K. Simon Yeung, PharmD, is a pharmacist in the Department of Integrative Medicine Service at Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, where he and his team evaluate different types of vitamins, dietary supplements, and anti-cancer treatments to determine whether there are genuine benefits and if there are drug interactions that health care professionals and their patients should be aware of when using these therapies in conjunction with chemotherapy or radiation. “We as a hospital have a policy in medication reconciliation that when we admit a patient or when a patient comes in for chemotherapy in an outpatient setting that we always ask them what kind of medication the patient is using. This would include all the dietary supplements and herbs as well,” Dr. Yeung said in an interview. Still, as is now well known, he noted, a significant percentage of patients do not inform their physicians about use of supplemental medications, often for fear of being rejected for chemotherapy treatment. “Mainstream physicians and nurses may or may not have training using dietary supplements so usually by default they will tell the patients not to use these agents because they may interact with the drug they are using,” Dr. Yeung continued. “But patients often continue using the supplements—again, without telling their doctors. That's a problem with communication.” To combat this problem, Dr. Yeung said rather than simply telling patients not to use a certain supplement, he will explain the reasons for his concern. Ginseng, for example, a common dietary supplement used by cancer patients, can have anticoagulating effects, so if a patient who is going into surgery tells him that he or she is using the herb, Dr. Yeung explains that it may cause excessive bleeding, and usually the patient will then comply. Similarly, St. John's wort, another common supplement used by patients, can have negative effects on standard cancer treatment. “Many patients use it for depression, to elevate their mood, and it's not uncommon for cancer patients to be depressed,” Dr. Yeung said. “But if they use St. John's wort together with certain chemo drugs such as irinotecan or imatinib, St. John's wort can induce the cytochrome P450, resulting in, for example, a 40 percent decrease in the serum level of irinotecan or imatinib—so this is a significant interaction.” MSKCC's ‘About Herbs’ Site Sloan-Kettering began addressing integrative medicine in 1999, which is when the “About Herbs” Web site (www.mskcc.org/aboutherbs) was launched. The site, under the direction of the Integrative Medicine Service (led by Barrie R. Cassileth, PhD, Chief of the Service and the Laurance S. Rockefeller Chair in Integrative Medicine), has an A-to-Z listing of common herbal medications. There are two portals on the site, one for health care professionals, and the other for patients. Individuals can search the origin of various herbs, their purported uses, and possible side effects and interactions, and there is also a listing of any clinical studies that have been done on the supplement. Dr. Yeung called the site an excellent source of information for physicians and patients, but emphasized the need for clinical studies in this area of medicine. “Very few herbs and drugs have been studied together in clinical settings so most of the other interactions that we know about or see in the literature are actually extrapolated from other studies or other clinical evidence and are theoretical interactions,” he said. Symptom Management Over the past 20 years researchers at the Mayo Clinic have been involved in 27 studies on symptom management with integrative cancer therapies, noted Charles L. Loprinzi, MD, Professor of Oncology there. Nineteen of those studies have been completed and published in peer-reviewed journals, and two additional manuscripts are currently in press. There are a number of symptoms related to cancer and cancer therapies, but physicians and patients often have trouble addressing these issues, he said. “Sometimes the information that patients are having symptoms does not get to the doctor. That may be because the patient downplays them, it may be because the doctor doesn't listen quite as closely, or it may be because they are both focusing so much on the treatment aspects that they don't spend as much time on the related symptoms.” Despite uncertainty as to whether integrative cancer therapies can be studied efficiently in traditional clinical settings, Mayo researchers have been able to take in-depth looks at 13 particular symptoms related to cancer or cancer therapy: mucosal toxicity, anorexia/cachexia, pain, hot flashes, skin toxicity, sexual symptoms, neuropathy, lymphedema, anemia, cognitive dysfunction, osteoporosis, insomnia, and fatigue.Figure: Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center's “About Herbs” Web siteThe researchers published a 20-year review of their work earlier this year in the Journal of Supportive Oncology (2007;5:119–125, 128) and concluded that the publication of both positive and negative results is important in order to separate what works from what doesn't.Figure: K. Simon Yeung, PharmD: “Very few herbs and drugs have been studied together in clinical settings, so most of the other interactions that we know about or see in the literature are actually extrapolated from other studies or other clinical evidence and are theoretical interactions.”The team currently has several studies under way, Dr. Loprinzi noted. For example: ▪ Use of ginkgo biloba versus placebo in the prevention of cognitive dysfunction in patients with breast cancer who are receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. ▪ Use of American ginseng to alleviate cancer fatigue. ▪ The herb valeriana officinalis as a treatment for insomnia. ▪ Sunscreen as a treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor-induced dermatitis. ▪ Use of vitamin B to alleviate hand-foot syndrome, after earlier trials showed that aloe vera gel did not improve radiation-induced chest wall toxicity. The group also published a study last year in the Journal of the Society of Integrative Oncol (2006; 4[4]:143–152) looking specifically at the issue of integrative medicine research. That study, led by Debra Barton, RN, PhD, AOCN, concluded that complementary/alternative medicine research can indeed be done in a scientifically sound manner. “Well-designed and adequately powered studies can be implemented and large numbers of patients can be accrued,” the researchers wrote. “The resulting research evaluations can be published in peer-reviewed medical journals.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Étiquettes directes de modèles (non validées)

Étiquettes de catégorie et de devis d'étude par modèle, issues des rondes d'étiquetage. C'est une sortie machine, non validée, et le désaccord entre modèles est livré comme donnée. Aucun devis ici n'est encore validé contre MEDLINE.

BrasCatégoriesDevis d'étudeConfiance
gemmaaucune catégorie
Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Autre
Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non
Sans objetlow
gptaucune catégorie
Domaine: non disponible · Genre: Autre
Porte sur le système de recherche canadien: non · Porte sur un sujet canadien: non
Sans objetlow
modèles en accordL'accord compare des ensembles de catégories et des devis identiques entre les bras.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Autre · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,414
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,993

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,432
Écart entre enseignants0,397 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Étiqueté directement par 2 modèles lisant le dossier complet.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreAutre

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetCancer Treatment and PharmacologyTravaux en français237 207