Notice bibliographique
Résumé
THINKING WOMEN AND HEALTH CARE REFORM IN CANADA Pat Armstrong, Barbara Clow, Karen Grant, Margaret Haworth-Brockman, Beth Jackson, Ann Pederson, and Morgan Seeley, Eds. Toronto: Women's Press, 2012 Thinking Women and Health Care Reform in Canada explores women's roles as both patients and practitioners in the Canadian health care system. Armstrong et al. begin with the premise that although the value of universal health care is established in Canadian society, its unique implications for are rarely addressed in calls for reform. Their study attempts to fill this lacuna by offering a gendered analysis of the organization of Canada's health care system and the social structures necessary to maintain it. By extending their research to include the role of unpaid care work in maintaining Canada's health care system they challenge previously held assumptions about the scope of health care analysis. Written by members of Women and Health Care Reform (WHCR), this book is billed as a legacy project updating more than a decade of their collective research before they disband due to federal budget restructuring. The anthology's coherence belies the individual authors' varied backgrounds; their history of collaboration is evident in the cohesiveness of this work. Each chapter incorporates similar methodological tools and theoretical foundations achieved through the use of four complementary frameworks--feminist political economy, feminist epistemologies, sex- and gender-based analysis, and intersectionality--all of allow for a conception of health that includes both individuals and communities. In so doing, they provide a broad overview of the organization of healthcare in Canada, while highlighting a cross-section of prominent issues in care that would benefit from a gendered analysis, including: residential long-term care, home care, the mental health of health care workers, private health insurance, and obesity. This collection argues that all aspects of health care are, indeed, women's issues. Armstrong et al. grapple with the inherent problem of assuming a single category of women but opt to utilize this term in a strategic capacity, reflecting the use of this category in health policy, while recognizing the unique issues of identity and power that fundamentally divide this group. To this end, they ask not only are the issues for women? in health, but also which are affected in what ways? Woven throughout this collection are references to women's unpaid care work as figuring prominently in the foundation of Canada's health care system. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».