MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2321320699 · doi:10.14288/1.0098952

Nurses’ descriptions of the experience of caring for culturally diverse clients

2009· article· en· W2321320699 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Sheryl Marie Reimer

Notice bibliographique

RevuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCultural Competency in Health Care
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCulturally appropriateNursingPsychologyEmpathyMedicineSocial psychologyFamily medicine

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Over the last few decades, Canada has become a culturally diverse society. It is now commonplace for nurses to care for clients from cultures different from their own. Caring for culturally diverse clients present unique challenges to nurses. These clients often do not speak English and come to the hospital setting with varying health beliefs and customs. Furthermore, the challenge of caring for culturally diverse clients may uncover feelings in nurses about various ethnic groups. While there is an encouraging trend to include cultural content in nursing curricula, the effectiveness of nursing programs in preparing nurses to care for culturally diverse clients is not known . Additionally, there is evidence to suggest that culturally diverse clients may receive a lower standard of nursing care that might be explained by factors such as the nurse's knowledge, previous contact with ethnic minorities, attitudes, education, support, and the hospital setting. Few studies about nurses' experiences of caring for culturally diverse clients have been found. The purpose of this study was to explore the descriptions of recently graduated nurses of their experiences of caring for culturally diverse clients and to thereby gain an understanding of both the nature of the experience and any factors influencing the experience. A descriptive-exploratory design in the qualitative (naturalistic) tradition was selected to address the Level 1 question. The design took some direction from the phenomenological objective about understanding lived experience, but broadened that perspective to focus upon the shared elements within the specific experience of caring for culturally diverse clients. Eight recently graduated nurses were each interviewed twice. Data analysis proceeded simultaneously with the interviews through a process of constant comparative analysis. The conceptual structure that emerged from the thematic analysis was validated with the participants during the second interviews. The findings of the study revealed the experience of caring for culturally diverse clients as one of considerable complexity and persistent challenge. On the basis of the participants' varied descriptions, the nurses were conceptualized on a continuum of commitment to cross-cultural nursing, ranging from being resistant to being competent to being impassioned. While the nurses demonstrated a propensity to practice from a particular position on the continuum, their level of commitment at any given point might be influenced by personal or contextual factors that moved them toward either end of the continuum. Notably, the impassioned nurses all described an experience of awakening to the complex imperative of cross-cultural nursing that came out of specific situations in which they were sensitized to the minority experience. In order to provide culturally sensitive care, the participants implemented creative and flexible efforts in connecting with the client, working with the family, accommodating for cultural practices, and balancing expectations. The nature of the experience for the nurse and the quality of care provided to culturally diverse clients was also influenced by certain contextual factors, or catalysts, beyond the control of the nurse. The catalysts identified were the setting of health care, the support of colleagues, the commitment of the institution, and the foundation of education. Most significantly, the study uncovered the presence of racism in health care settings. The most obvious examples of racism came in the descriptions by the participants of the resistant nurses who were not represented in the sample. Other examples included inequities at the institutional level. In light of these findings, implications for education, administration, practice, research, and public policy were identified.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,676
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,789

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,264
Écart entre enseignants0,237 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Même sujetCultural Competency in Health CareTravaux en français237 207