MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2321659477 · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.9128

An Introduction to the Management of Labour and Delivery - A Simulation-Based Obstetrics Workshop for Medical Students

2012· article· en· W2321659477 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

affAu moins un auteur déclare une institution canadienne dans l'instantané OpenAlex épinglé.

Notice bibliographique

RevueMedEdPORTAL · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Ottawa
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésObstetricsMedical educationObstetrics and gynaecologyMedicineComputer sciencePregnancy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The following is a description of a simulation-based workshop for undergraduate medical students during their first week of clerkship in Obstetrics. This workshop was developed to complement the didactic lectures that medical students receive as part of their clerkship and addresses the basics of intrapartum management so that students can feel more like part of the team during their first days in the case room. There are several reasons why medical students may have limited exposure to aspects of obstetrics during their clerkship. The short duration of the rotation, the reduced availability of patients willing to have medical students observe and perform obstetrical techniques, and the potential for unpredictable, serious complications to occur in seconds are all conditions that conspire to create reduced learning opportunities for clerks. Unfortunately, it is the very same practical opportunities that medical students are excluded from that serve to increase their understanding and interest in the speciality. Given the successful implementation simulation education in residency programs, its use in undergraduate medical education may serve as a practical solution to the marginalization of medical students during their obstetrics rotation. The current curriculum was designed for a simulation-based workshop during the first week of the obstetrics clerkship to instruct students in the diagnosis of labour and gain an appreciation for the decisions that are made as part of intra-partum management. Prior to the development of this curriculum, formal teaching for clerkship students in obstetrics and gynaecology at our institution consisted solely of didactic lectures. The objective of this simulation-based innovation was to alleviate the students' anxiety at the beginning of their rotation through providing opportunities to practice clinical skills necessary for success during clerkship. Furthermore, it was thought that engaging the students early on in their clinical training could help to foster an interest in pursuing postgraduate training in obstetrics and gynecology. This workshop was developed in accordance with the educational objectives described in the US-based Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics (APGO). This simulation follows a single obstetrical patient whose clinical course is followed by the students from presentation to the obstetrical assessment unit until spontaneous vaginal delivery and immediate postpartum care. Through use of a high-fidelity mannequin, this simulation provides students the opportunity to examine the patient throughout the course of her labour to assess dilation and ultimately perform a vaginal delivery. The workshop also incorporates elements of interactive teaching and round table discussion that encourages student participation. You will find a full curriculum document which can be used as an instructors manual, as well as a pre- and post-test which can be used to assess learning during the workshop, and a hand-out for students summarizing the objectives of the session. This workshop has been in use at our institution since the 2008–2009 and has been incredibly well-received by students, as evidenced by anonymous written evaluations. Their confidence and knowledge-base during their first days on service in labour & delivery are noticeably improved, and we documented successful learning on a pre- and post-test comparison, as published in “Medical Education” in 2010.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,017
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,328

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,038
Tête enseignante GPT0,397
Écart entre enseignants0,359 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle