Review: Diplomacy in the Digital Age <i>Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb</i>
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
DIPLOMACY IN THE DIGITAL AGE Essays in Honour of Ambassador Allan Gotlieb Janice Gross Stein, ed. Toronto: McClelland and Stewart, 2011. 288pp, $29.99 (cloth). ISBN 978-0-7710-8139-2Scorned by scholars, ridiculed in the media and neglected by governments, diplomacy desperately needs some serious attention. The arrival of a new book on the subject, particularly one dealing with the Canadian experience and dedicated to examining the legacy of a distinguished former ambassador, Allan Gotlieb, is therefore cause for celebration. Diplomacy in the Digital Age features an exceptional range of contributors, offers a variety of perspectives on modern diplomatic practice, and provides some useful insights into the workings of the world's second-oldest profession. With 17 concise, diverse, and largely well-written chapters, the book provides an overview, stimulates reflection, and whets the appetite for more.To contextualize a fuller assessment of this anthology, however, I would observe that today, in too many countries around the globe, diplomacy is feeing very tough times. Countries such as China, India, Brazil, and Turkey are significant exceptions, but elsewhere, and especially in the west, the budgets of foreign ministries are shrinking, foreign services are losing staff, and diplomatic missions are closing. Many western governments are looking to military force as their international instrument of choice.Canada is no exception. Today, the country lacks diplomatic initiative. Recall, by way of comparison, the record of the Mulroney years, including free trade with the United States, the Rio conference on environment and development, the campaign to end apartheid, the Montreal protocol on ozone depletion, and the acid rain treaty. Consider too the niche diplomacy that characterized Lloyd Axwcrth/s human security agenda during the second half of the 19905, including the land mine treaty, the Kimberley process to curtail trade in blood diamonds, the creation of the International Criminal Court, restrictions on child soldiers, and the responsibility to protect. Relative to these achievements, Canadian internationalism has all but disappeared today. The world, finally, has taken note. The spectacular failure in the fall of 2OIO to win a seat on the UN security council testifies to this decline.Gotiieb was Canada's ambassador to Washington from 1981 to 1989, at a time when this country occupied a larger space on the world stage. He was a pioneer, not just in conducting diplomacy - especially public diplomacy in Washington - but also in thinking about how to make diplomacy more effective and foreign ministries more relevant His contributions in this regard deserve recognition.Regrettably, the Canadian government has recently repudiated Gotlieb's prescription instead of building upon it. DFAIT is more marginalized than ever. It still does not serve as a central agency for the integration of international policy across government. Decision-makers no longer solicit its strategic advice. Budget cuts, the centralization of control over government communications, and the gagging of the foreign service have made Canadian public diplomacy nearly impossible.Oddly, the anthology gives no hint of these developments. It leaves the reader with no sense of urgency or crisis. It does not defend diplomacy as a nonviolent and cost-effective approach to managing global issues. Given the dire circumstances facing Canadian diplomats, these lacunae are curious. More significantly, the volume ignores a crucial question: What has become of Gotlieb's legacy, and why? It likewise fails to evaluate the specific implications of a digital world for Canadian foreign policy. All of this leaves the reader with a slight sense of disconnectedness.The book features a good balance of contributions from academics (Janice Stein, Denis Stairs, Kim Nossal, Brian Bow, Bob Bothwell), serving (Marc Lortie, Elissa Goldberg, Arif Lalani) and former (Jeremy Kinsman, David Malone, George Haynal ) diplomats, and ex- journalists (Sondra Gotlieb, Andrew Cohen, Drew Fagan, Ed Greenspon, William Thorsell). …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,005 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,005 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,016 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».