MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2322616913 · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e31820925c7

Osler, Guilds, and Community

2011· article· en· W2322616913 sur OpenAlexaffabout
J. Donald Boudreau, Yvonne Steinert, Mary Ellen Macdonald

Notice bibliographique

RevueAcademic Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueInnovations in Medical Education
Établissements canadiensMcGill University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrotherProfessionalizationGeneral partnershipApprenticeshipMetaphorKinshipCompassionAnachronismStudent lifePsychologyAestheticsSociologyHistoryLawArtPhilosophyPolitical scienceTheology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In Reply: We are delighted and gratified by Dr. Fins' sentiments. Although the findings of our research may, to some extent, have seemed foreseeable, we admit to being somewhat startled ourselves at the intensity and directions of the emotions expressed by the Osler Fellows. Dr. Fins alluded to a fascinating historical root, The Merchant of Prato, conveying the notion of communal life. To great effect, he also summoned the spirit of Sir William Osler to conjure up a vision of professional life as overlapping with family life. We wish to cite another legendary figure: Abraham Flexner. In an essay in which he defines the term profession, Flexner1 states: “A profession is a brotherhood …. Professional activities are so definite, so absorbing in interest, so rich in duties and responsibilities, that they completely engage their votaries.” These words suggest that the process of professionalization affects individuals at the very core of their beings, values, and beliefs. Although the descriptor “brother” is decidedly anachronistic, the spirit of this metaphor for physicianhood vividly evokes the notion of kinship and community. The Osler Fellows have come to realize their (potentially) critical role in the personal transformations undergone by their student learners. Although it was not an explicit objective of the Physician Apprenticeship course when designed and first implemented, it has become obvious from our ongoing program evaluation that a desired outcome is for the students and teachers, in partnership, to keep the flame of physicianship alive: the physician as a compassionate, caring, and competent healer. In the faculty development workshops in which they are prepared for the tasks and responsibilities that lie ahead, successive cohorts of Osler Fellows have been advised that students might very well be surprised, perplexed, and, at times, even shocked during the medical school experience. In fact, it has been suggested that a subtitle for the Osler Fellows could quite possibly be borrowed from Maimonides'2 magnum opus, The Guide for the Perplexed. The ideal teacher in the apprenticeship has been described as one who will mentor, accompany, and guide students on a voyage of self-discovery, one who will preserve their humanity and a sense of appreciation of the art as well as the science of medicine. We believe that the teachers understood and accepted this responsibility. However, what was unexpected, and what our research has begun to clarify, is the impact that participating in the apprenticeship has had on the teachers themselves. It seems as if they, too, can benefit from a reimmersion in the journey of personal transformation common to the community of all physicians. In reflecting on his experience, one Osler Fellow summarized it thus: “It's [like] a kind of falling in love again with your wife or spouse or significant other, because this program, on a personal level, brought back all of the things that you had initially fallen in love with … what it is to be a physician, exactly.” J. Donald Boudreau, MD Core faculty, Centre for Medical Education, Arnold P. Gold Foundation Associate Professor of Medicine, and associate professor, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; [email protected]. Yvonne Steinert, PhD Associate dean for faculty development, director, Centre for Medical Education, and professor, Department of Family Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. Mary Ellen Macdonald, PhD Core faculty, Centre for Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, and assistant professor, Faculty of Dentistry, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,005
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,032
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Théorique ou conceptuel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,043
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,052

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0050,032
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0090,007
Communication savante0,0060,008
Science ouverte0,0030,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0430,043
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,005

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,118
Tête enseignante GPT0,379
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeThéorique ou conceptuel
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2011
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAcademic Medicine→Même sujetInnovations in Medical Education→Travaux en français237 207→