MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2322904902 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000395330.94557.7b

Colorectal Cancer: Best to Start Chemo by 4 Weeks After Surgery

2011· article· en· W2322904902 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Rabiya S. Tuma

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueColorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineColorectal cancerCancerAdjuvant chemotherapyClinical trialChemotherapyAdverse effectGeneral surgeryRandomized controlled trialInternal medicineOncologySurgeryBreast cancer

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

GI Cancers SymposiumSAN FRANCISCO—Colorectal cancer patients who start adjuvant chemotherapy within four weeks of surgery have a significantly lower risk of recurrence compared with patients who initiate chemotherapy eight or 12 weeks after surgery, researchers reported here at the Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium. The message was clear, said Richard M. Goldberg, MD, Associate Director of Clinical Research at the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, who chaired the session in which the data were presented. “Treat your patient as soon as you can, because outcomes are better with treatment started at four weeks than later.”JAMES J. BIAGI, MD: “We believe the level of evidence from our study, with the knowledge that this relationship will not be subjected to prospective assessment, provides sufficient proof of an adverse association. We think, based on these results, that clinicians and jurisdictions should make efforts to optimize logistics that minimize time to adjuvant chemotherapy.”Although adjuvant chemotherapy is standard for patients with locally advanced or high-risk colorectal cancer, the importance of treatment timing has not been fully explored. “Two common clinical assumptions are that chemotherapy should commence as soon as practical after surgical resection, and that chemotherapy offered beyond three months may not provide benefit,” said the study's lead author, James J. Biagi, MD, Associate Professor and Acting Head of Oncology at Queen's University Cancer Research Institute in Ontario. Because these assumptions are unlikely to be tested in a randomized controlled trial, Dr. Biagi and colleagues performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to evaluate the true impact of chemotherapy timing. Examining both the published literature and abstract presentations, the team identified nine studies that examined the time between surgery and chemotherapy and treatment benefit. Based on a meta-analysis of those data, which included more than 14,000 patients, Dr. Biagi and his colleagues estimated that there was a 15% increased risk of disease recurrence and a 12% increased risk of death at five years for every four weeks of treatment delay, beyond the initial four weeks after surgery. Modeled a Hypothetical Patient Using Adjuvant! Online To illustrate the impact of that increased risk, the researchers modeled a hypothetical patient using Adjuvant! Online. For a 65-year-old male in good general health with T3N2 disease, the estimated five-year overall survival rate would be 45% with no chemotherapy and 60% with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy. If those estimates were based on receiving chemotherapy at four weeks, then the patient's estimated five-year survival rate would decrease to 55% if chemotherapy started at eight weeks and 50% if it started at 12 weeks. Looking at this at a population level, Dr Biagi noted that there were 140,000 new cases of colorectal cancer in the United States in 2009. If one assumes that 35% of those cases were Stage III, then 49,000 individuals would be eligible for adjuvant chemotherapy. If one arbitrarily assumes that half of them are able to start adjuvant chemotherapy four weeks after surgery but instead were delayed to eight weeks, that would put 1,225 lives at risk at five years. Despite the drop in benefit with increased time between surgery and chemotherapy, there may be some remaining benefit for patients treated after three months, Dr. Biagi said. For example, his hypothetical patient had a 45% overall survival rate with no chemotherapy but a 50% overall survival with chemotherapy starting at 12 weeks. “This would suggest that there may actually be some benefit to chemotherapy beyond that arbitrary three-month window,” he said.RICHARD M. GOLDBERG, MD: “The message was clear: Treat your patient as soon as you can, because outcomes are better with treatment started at four weeks compared with later.”“Our analysis suggests a significant adverse association between time to adjuvant chemotherapy and survival in colorectal cancer. We believe the level of evidence from our study, with the knowledge that this relationship will not be subjected to prospective assessment, provides sufficient proof of an adverse association. We think, based on these results, that clinicians and jurisdictions should make efforts to optimize logistics that minimize time to adjuvant chemotherapy,” he concluded. “I think what we see from this study is that we need to start tracking this a little bit better in clinical trials and that control it better,” said the study's Discussant, Johanna Bendell, MD, Associate Director of Drug Development and Director of Gastrointestinal Cancer Research at Sarah Cannon Research Institute. “And we also need to encourage coordinated care within the health care systems.” Meeting Cosponsors The Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium is cosponsored by the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Gastroenterological Association Institute, the American Society for Radiation Oncology, and the Society of Surgical Oncology.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,360
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0150,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,034
Tête enseignante GPT0,306
Écart entre enseignants0,272 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsTravaux en français237 207