Northern land use planning : a context for wildlife habitat management and conservation in the Beaufort Sea-Mackenzie Delta Region
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
This thesis focusses on the conflict between the land use requirements of oil and gas development and wildlife habitat in the Beaufort Sea-Mackenzie Delta region, and how it is being resolved by the federal government. It is argued that even if values associated with wildlife and wildlife habitat were adequately recognized at the operational level, the government's mechanisms for land use planning and management are inadequate to ensure the long-term conservation of important wildlife resources. Specifically, the objectives of the thesis are: • to determine criteria for a northern land use planning and management regime that would ensure that it is capable of recognizing wildlife habitat as an important land use; • to analyze existing institutional mechanisms and government activities in light of these criteria; • to determine where changes in the planning/management regime are necessary. The relevant features of the current land administration regime and land use interests north of 60° are described. As well, an on-going land use conflict in the Beaufort Sea region is documented to illustrate how government deals with such issues; that is, the 'real' policy regarding wildlife habitat and industrial development in northern land use decisions. Gulf-Canada Resources Incorporated's proposal and application to construct a deep water harbour facility at Stokes Point on the north Yukon coast serves as the case example. In comparing the current land administration regime and government actions regarding Gulf's proposal to the criteria that are suggested for an idealized land use planning and management system, it is concluded that: • the federal government lacks a clearly articulated policy which indicates land and resource use priorities in the North. • although it has stated that the establishment of a northern land use planning process is a high priority, DIAND's efforts to date have not been successful in this regard. There is as yet no well-defined approach to northern land use planning through which major land use decisions can be dealt with in a systematic and comprehensive manner. • although it is charged with administering land and resources north of 60°, the commitment of the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development (DIAND) to protecting the natural environment and maintaining the integrity of wildlife habitat in the Beaufort Sea-Mackenzie Delta region is in doubt. • DIAND has also failed to adhere to principles of cooperation and 'due process' that are valued in an open and comprehensive land use planning process. Therefore, the following measures are recommended to improve northern land use planning and management in the interests of effective wildlife habitat management and conservat ion. Land use planning: • DIAND should continue its efforts, in cooperation with territorial governments and native organizations, to establish an accepted land use planning process. This process should be in place before further major development proposals are considered. DIAND should then review, and amend where appropriate, the elements of the current land administration in light of goals and principles established under this comprehensive planning process. Wildlife habitat conservation: • A land use planning process for the North should be able to recognize wildlife habitat as an important, and where necessary, highest priority land use. Incorporating a regional habitat identification and zoning strategy into a land use planning process is one method of achieving this recognition. Policy development: • Simultaneous to developing a northern land use planning process, DIAND is also formulating a northern conservation strategy. Clearly these two policies are conceptually and functionally related, and their development should be closely integrated. Northern Yukon: • Values and priorities regarding land use in northern Yukon should be openly reviewed and assessed. If it is resolved that wildlife habitat should remain as a primary land use, it is suggested that a park, national wildlife area or combination thereof be established in conjunction with native land claim agreements in the region.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,015 |
| Communication savante | 0,009 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».