Abstract 64: Quality and feasibility of a protocol for simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and tissue for IHC from needle core lymph node biopsies in DLBCL adapted for multi-center trials.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction: Personalized medicine strategies targeting specific aberrations unique to an individual tumor, are promising to become a new paradigm in the fight against cancer. Such tailored approaches rely on the thorough profiling of malignant tissues by high-throughput technologies followed by selection of appropriate treatment targeting tumor-specific aberrations. One fundamental challenge, whose resolution is necessary for any successful personalized medicine endeavor, is isolation of useful amounts of good quality molecular material for reliable tumor characterization in downstream assays. Here, we describe our standardized protocol for biopsy collection and results from a multi-center phase II clinical trial investigating the use of panobinostat with or without rituximab in relapsed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (NCT01238692). Results: Biopsies are performed with patient consent, before treatment initiation and after 15 days of treatment, in patients with safely accessible lesions. Four needle core biopsies are collected at each time point using standard operating procedures to limit pre-analytical variability. Of these, one is preserved in formalin for immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses, while the remaining three are pooled together in RPMI 1640 media. These samples are sent to a central laboratory for further processing. The needle cores in RPMI 1640 undergo B-cell purification using a negative selection kit (StemCell Technologies). Isolation of tumor RNA and DNA is performed using a commercially available kit (Qiagen). Of the 23 patients currently enrolled, 16 (70%) have had a pre-treatment biopsy performed and of these, 7 (44% of those biopsied, 30% of all patients) have also had a post-treatment biopsy, demonstrating the feasibility of tissue collection at participating sites. We assess the effect of transport on the quality and yield of RNA and DNA as well as differences in quality and yield between pre-treatment biopsy vs. biopsies at day 15. The material isolated from these biopsies is evaluated for suitability in downstream applications, namely IHC, gene expression microarray and DNA exome sequencing. Conclusions: The development of standard operating procedures for the collection and processing of biospecimens is essential to control for pre-analytical variability inherent to multicenter trials. Our experience shows that this is both feasible and crucial to understanding of tumor molecular profile changes associated with treatment. Our protocol allows extraction of RNA and DNA of sufficient quality and quantity to permit downstream multi-dimensional analysis. Patient acceptance of research biopsies has been high although the rate of pre-treatment biopsies is greater than that of post-treatment biopsies. Finally, our work demonstrates that the timing of post-treatment biopsies is critical. Citation Format: Torsten H. Nielsen, Zuanel Diaz, Rosa Christodoulopoulos, Lu Yao, Samia Qureshi, Naciba Benlimame, Errol Camlioglu, Michael Crump, Ryan D. Morin, Nathalie Johnson, Tina P. Haliotis, Wilson H. Miller, Sarit Assouline, Koren K. Mann. Quality and feasibility of a protocol for simultaneous isolation of RNA, DNA and tissue for IHC from needle core lymph node biopsies in DLBCL adapted for multi-center trials. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 64. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-64
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,011 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,010 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».