P44 Anticoagulation control in adults with congenital heart disease
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Among patients with acquired cardiovascular disease taking oral vitamin K antagonist medications, time within therapeutic range (TTR) is considered poor when below 60%. To date, however, there are no data about anticoagulation control in adults with congenital heart disease (CHD). This is concerning given that they represent an emerging and growing population of cardiac patients with specific management considerations. Objectives In a sample of adults with CHD taking oral vitamin K antagonist medications, we investigated (i) TTR and (ii) socio-demographic and medical factors associated with lower anticoagulation control. Methods In this retrospective study, the following were study inclusion criteria: age ≥ 18 years, diagnosis of CHD, prescribed oral vitamin K antagonist medication, followed in the thrombosis clinic at least once between January 2005 and December 2010, and adequate frequency of recording of INR values. We documented medical and socio-demographic background, indication for anticoagulation therapy, international normalised ratio (INR) values, and TTR; data were recorded through December 2013. Results We identified 119 eligible patients (49% male; mean age = 39 ± 17 years; mean follow up duration = 4 ± 2.3 years). Defect complexity was categorised as simple (n = 29; 24%), moderate (n = 46, 39%) or great (n = 44; 37%). Specific indications for oral anticoagulation were cardiac arrhythmias (n = 60; 51%), prior thrombus/emboli event (n = 30; 25%), mechanical valves (n = 24; 20%), and other (n = 5; 4%). Twenty-three patients (19%) had a documented psychiatric disorder and 21 patients (18%) had a history of medication non-adherence. Of 71 patients with known educational attainment, 45 (38%) had earned college or university degrees. Of 119 study patients, the mean TTR was 49 ± 19% (range: 0–89%); 82 patients (69%) had poor anticoagulation control (TTR < 60%). TTR varied significantly by disease complexity (p < 0.05); TTR was lowest among patients with CHD of moderate complexity (44%) and highest among patients with CHD of simple complexity (55%). TTR was also significantly lower among patients with mechanical valves vs. those with other indications for anticoagulation (41% vs. 50%, p < 0.05); 79% of patients with mechanical valves had poor anticoagulation control. TTR was significantly lower for patients for whom non-adherence was documented in the medical chart (32% vs. 52%; p < 0.001). TTR did not vary as a function of age, sex, presence of psychiatric disorder, or educational attainment. Conclusions Among our study cohort of adults with CHD, patients were within therapeutic INR range only half of the time and more than two-thirds of patients had poor anticoagulation control. Poorer anticoagulation control was observed in patients with moderate defect complexity, with mechanical valves, and with a documented history of medication non-adherence. Future investigation into the clinical outcomes of sub-optimal INR control as well as the potential role of novel oral anticoagulant agents is encouraged.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».