MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2324125254 · doi:10.1176/pn.41.23.0017

Consider Patients' Mental Health, Not Just Mental Illness

2006· article· en· W2324125254 sur OpenAlexaff
Dauda Griffin

Notice bibliographique

RevuePsychiatric News · 2006
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueEmpathy and Medical Education
Établissements canadiensChild, Adolescent and Family Mental Health
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésWonderMental healthPsychoanalysisPsychologyAnxietyMedicinePsychiatrySocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Back to table of contents Previous article Next article Residents' ForumFull AccessConsider Patients' Mental Health, Not Just Mental IllnessDauda Griffin, M.D.Dauda GriffinSearch for more papers by this author, M.D.Published Online:1 Dec 2006https://doi.org/10.1176/pn.41.23.0017When I initially expressed interest in a career in psychiatry, I was commonly asked, “Are you sure you want to work with crazy people for the rest of your life?” I devised a rote reply, fortified by unshakable confidence and optimism for the purpose of alleviating their genuine anxiety about my career choice. However, over time I began to wonder whether I had committed myself to a career-long sense of regret.Mrs. P was dying of lung cancer and was the first terminally ill patient I worked with as a third-year medical student. At first I was frightened to get too close to her during my early-morning rounds. Intellectually I understood that her disease was not contagious, but I somehow felt that I would get contaminated with the dark spirit of death surrounding her. Yet I was conflicted because she seemed so impassioned and so content that I was simultaneously drawn to her.In medicine, the preservation of life and prevention of death are among the most prominent goals of our work. When I asked “Are you afraid to die?” she slowly and softly found my hand—instantly making me aware of my rapid pulse as my neck veins beat against my tight collar.“ Not at all,” she replied. She went on to tell me what a wonderful life she had lived and that she accepted that it was her time to move on. I looked forward to holding her hand every morning until her final day. I learned along the way that there is nothing wrong with holding the hand of a dying patient and that this was, in fact, one of the best treatments I could offer some patients.My relationship with Mrs. P provided a foundation for examining the issues of providing support and appropriate clinical distance during my psychiatry residency. Clinical distance defines the professional relationship between a doctor and patient as different from a personal one. What are the options regarding clinical distance? Examples of being too close, just close enough, and too distant can all be found in the history of psychiatry. Finding the right clinical distance is akin to performing a delicate dance between the task, goal, and bond of the patient and therapist.Why is preserving the alliance balanced with creating appropriate clinical distance so important? From my readings of Sullivan, Havens, and others, the relationship between patient and therapist (the “alliance”) is the most important tool psychiatrists have to help their patients achieve positive outcomes. The alliance between the patient and the doctor congeal to serve as a beacon—one that contains the power to pierce through the fog of mental disease. This light has the ability to illuminate the path leading toward mental health recovery. Our patients come to us cloudy, their minds muddied by their symptoms. Understanding the personhood of the patient aids in the allimportant alliance formation.I was able to find the person in Mrs. P because I came to understand her wellness, not just the diagnosis of her illness. In many medical specialties there are key concepts of health promotion and disease prevention, but in psychiatry there is an emphasis on mental illness. I propose that we conceptualize our psychiatric patients in a frame of mental health, not mental illness. It is the unfortunate truth that by conceptualizing our patients in terms of mental illness, we foster a problem-based schism of the individual. The current gold standard for diagnosing mental illness in our profession, DSM-IV, provides little information about what should be considered signs and symptoms of mental health. Health and well-ness are separate from one another in that health is what the clinician perceives, and wellness is what the patient perceives.Subscribing to this framework of mental health and wellness liberates us to understand mental illness as an aspect of an overarching context of mental health. Perhaps this will aid in the eradication of the stigma of mental illness, making it much easier for physicians to find the person amid the fog of mental disease. ▪Dauda Griffin, M.D., is an APA/SAMHSA fellow in child and adolescent psychiatry at Emory University School of Medicine. ISSUES NewArchived

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,139
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,530

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,313
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2006
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePsychiatric NewsMême sujetEmpathy and Medical EducationTravaux en français237 207