MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2324389750 · doi:10.1353/mdr.2007.0065

Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism: Approaching the Living Theatre, Happenings/Fluxus, and the Black Arts Movement (review)

2007· article· en· W2324389750 sur OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lisa Wolford Wylam

Notice bibliographique

RevueModern Drama · 2007
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueTheatre and Performance Studies
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCriticismThe artsDramaDemiseHistoricismArtPerforming artsPerformance artPoliticsArt historyAvant gardeHistoryVisual artsLiteratureLawPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Reviewed by: Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism: Approaching the Living Theatre, Happenings/Fluxus, and the Black Arts Movement Lisa Wolford Wylam Mike Sell . Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism: Approaching the Living Theatre, Happenings/Fluxus, and the Black Arts Movement. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2005. Pp. 336, illustrated. $60 (Hb). Recognized with an honourable mention for the Joe A. Callaway Prize for best book on theatre and drama, Mike Sell's Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism examines three distinct American experimental art practices. Written from a critical perspective informed by new historicism and performance studies and structured as a series of case studies, Sell's book historicizes the early performances of the Living Theatre, Allan Kaprow's Happenings, and the Black Arts Movement. Each, Sell demonstrates, emblematizes particular cultural needs and strategies of social change, while being generally imbricated in the politics of the Cold War period. Departing from the insight that radical avant-garde movements are nourished and sustained by the academy, Sell interrogates the normalizing and potentially compromising force of such critical labour; simultaneously, he highlights the challenges [End Page 467] that avant-garde performance practices pose for formalist, objectivizing modes of critique. Writing in the wake of the catastrophic attack of 11 September 2001, Sell reflects on various premature articulations of the avant-garde's demise, eulogies that ring false among the global struggles of the current historical moment. "By examining the efforts of cultural radicals during the sixties to open up or tear down oppressive symbolic, discursive, and institutional systems," he writes, "we can learn much about the possibilities and limitations of similar efforts in our own times" (4). Sell surveys key texts that theorize avant-garde production, highlighting the need for greater attention to materialist concerns, along with an increased self-reflexivity regarding the conservative tendencies implicit in criticism itself: norms of critical practice, he emphasizes, discourage and invalidate the emotional, sensorial, and somatic elements of the critic's response. Defining the avant-garde as "a radical, revolutionary cultural movement that works outside of parliamentary process and not merely an urge toward formal or conceptual experiment" (20), Sell argues that such forms of cultural production force the critic to acknowledge the limitations of both formalist analysis and utopian rhapsody, with their attendant dangers of mystification, a-historicism, and depoliticization. The book's first case study examines Julian Beck and Judith Malina's Living Theatre, through which Artaud's influence was viscerally interjected into American political theatre and countercultural performance. Sell details the activist impulses that informed the Living Theatre's early work: their landmark production of Jack Gelber's The Connection, for example, limned the link between avant-garde production and drug prohibition by foregrounding jazz subculture and heroin addiction. Sell's analysis examines the extent to which even a movement with such anarchic goals as the Living Theatre remains caught within the very systems of authority and global capital it seeks to destabilize. He evocatively traces the ways in which The Connection's "translation of heroin from mere prop into dramaturgy" facilitated a mercurial form of countercultural bonding (130). Ably combining thick description and materialist analysis, Sell demonstrates how criticism can enrich understanding of both aesthetic and cultural dynamics in performance. Avant-Garde Performance and the Limits of Criticism approaches the Fluxus movement and the emergence of "Happenings" in the United States by way of Allan Kaprow's Eighteen Happenings in Six Parts, which Sell positions as emblematic for two reasons: first, its quasi-canonical status in academic constructions of the movement and, second, the challenges it poses to normative critical practices, which are implicitly rooted in panoptic knowledge and illusions of objectivity. [End Page 468] Sell complicates such totalizing perspectives by mapping the porous boundaries and transnational impulses behind Fluxus, Happenings, and related forms of cultural work that sought to resist commodification in the global marketplace. Dematerializing the art object, such work reveals as ludicrous the notion of the object's economic "value" as well as the investment of conventional modes of critique in quantifying such value. "The moment that value is undermined," Sell argues, "history shivers apart" (141). Drawing on the literary...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,006
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,006
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0060,006
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0060,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,028
Tête enseignante GPT0,238
Écart entre enseignants0,210 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2007
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueModern DramaMême sujetTheatre and Performance StudiesTravaux en français237 207