Sphenoorbital Meningioma: Surgical Series and Design of Intraoperative Management Paradigm
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction: Sphenoorbital meningiomas (SOMs) are slow-growing infiltrative lesions that are complicated by extensive hyperostosis of the skull base, and characterized by distinct morphological and clinical features. The primary treatment for symptomatic or growing SOM is surgical removal. The main surgical goals are reduction of proptosis and restoration of visual function. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 27 consecutive patients treated surgically for SOM between 2006 and 2014, with special attention to clinical and radiological presentation, surgical technique, and long-term outcome. Primary outcomes were defined as postoperative visual function and radiological exophthalmos, which were compared with the preoperative baseline. The affect of multiple variables on these outcomes was statistically analyzed, including three specific surgical stages: performing anterior clinoidectomy, placing epidural autologous fat graft, and reconstructing the orbit with rigid material. Results: Study cohort comprised of 24 women and 3 men with mean age of 53.3 ± 12 years (range 27–78 years). Clinical proptosis was the most common presenting sign, followed by visual loss, with rates of 92 and 37%, respectively. Preoperatively, radiological exophthalmos was evident in all patients (EI>1). Complete tumor resection (Simpson grade I/II) was achieved in 51.8%. Extent of resection was limited in 13 cases due to dural invasion to the cavernous sinus (61.5%), superior orbital fissure (84%), and the intraorbital intraconal space (15%). Low rates of both tumor recurrence after complete resection (7.4% in 40.7 average follow-up months) and progression of residual tumor (3.7%) are reported. Surgical resection caused visual improvement in 80% of the patients with impaired vision, and exophthalmos reduction in 77% of the cases. The postoperative reduction of the mean EI was statistically significant ( p < 0.05). Univariate analysis showed two parameters to be statistically significant factors affecting favorable response of visual status to surgical treatment: preoperative visual deficit ( p = 0.0001), and optic canal involvement ( p = 0.04). Two other parameters, cavernous sinus involvement and incomplete tumor resection, showed a tendency toward favorable response, but failed to reach statistical significance. Surgical complications mainly included transient morbidity secondary to cranial nerve injury; Long- term postoperative neurological deficit includes 1 patient with permanent oculomotor nerve palsy (3.7%), and 1 patient (3.7%) with transient decrease in visual acuity that improved gradually. None of the patients experienced postoperative complication that prompted second intervention. Specifically, there were no cases of postoperative epidural hematoma or acute enophthalmos. Conclusions: Surgical goals in the treatment of SOM should be the relief of leading symptoms rather than complete tumor resection, which is commonly limited by tumor invasion to the superior orbital fissure, cavernous sinus, and extraocular muscles. Therefore, tailoring the surgical technique to individual cases is encouraged. According to our experience and review of existing literature, we present an optional intraoperative management paradigm for surgical removal of SOMs, which incorporates selective anterior clinoidectomy, elimination of epidural dead space by placing autologous fat graft, and selective rigid orbital reconstruction. Satisfactory visual, cosmetic and oncological results as well as low morbidity were achieved by following this paradigm.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».