MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2325899069 · doi:10.1097/01.hj.0000357868.95465.36

Is it time for a change of plans?

2009· article· en· W2325899069 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gyl A. Kasewurm

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Hearing Journal · 2009
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineDecision Sciences
ThématiqueComplex Systems and Decision Making
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSurpriseQuarter (Canadian coin)HistoryDemographic economicsPsychologyPolitical scienceMarketingBusinessOperations managementEconomicsSocial psychology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Previous commitments caused my husband and me to be in different cities recently before leaving on vacation. As a result, I had arranged a short flight from Chicago to Detroit so we could fly together. When I arrived at O'Hare, I was surprised to learn that the airline had no record of my reservation. After some research, I discovered to my surprise that I had actually booked my flight for a day in June, which was problematic since this happened on a day in March! When I realized there were no other flights that would get me to Detroit in time, I had no choice but to change my travel plans. On my way, I mulled over the unexpected changes I had been forced to make and wondered, “Is it time to make changes in my business plan?” Unless you've been hiding under a rock, you know that our economy has experienced dramatic change in the past year. The HJ Report column in the May issue of this magazine noted that the hearing aid market experienced stagnant growth in the first quarter of 2009 after declining in the second half of 2008. Therefore, it may be time for a change of plans. Perhaps one answer is to focus less on getting new patients and more on keeping the patients we have. Here are some suggestions that might help: Take better care of current patients: Patients are entering the hearing aid market at younger ages and living longer, so it makes sense that retaining current patients is even more important for your business now than in the past. What special services or attention can we offer to patients that will cause them to commit to our organization for a lifetime? People like to feel special, so we should look for every opportunity to make our patients feel like part of our hearing healthcare family. Send them cards on their birthdays, remember special occasions with flowers, or make a personal phone call to inquire how they are hearing. When introducing a new product or service, take patients out to lunch or coffee and get their impressions. What you learn may surprise you. It's the personal touch that matters. In case you haven't noticed, a patient can go anywhere to buy a hearing aid, including the Internet or their local drug store. So, make it obvious to patients why they should choose you. Get patients to spread the word: It's said that consumers will tell two people about a pleasant experience and ten people about an unpleasant experience. Simple math tells us that a business really can't afford any unhappy patients. Happy hearing aid patients tend to forget to tell others about how well they hear because they take it for granted. So, if you want more patient referrals, you have to recruit them. Have cards printed and try to persuade patients to distribute them to everyone they know. When a patient refers someone to your office, thank them for the referral and then remind them to keep up the good work. The cost of a patient-referral program is low, so the extra revenues contribute directly to your bottom line. Don't let good prospects get away: According to some informal research, the average hearing healthcare practitioner convinces only about 50% of the patients they see who need help to get it from them. So what happens to the other 50%? They either continue without help or they go to another practice that does persuade them to take action. Every practice needs a follow-up program for these individuals. Even if the original visit failed to produce results, don't give up on them. If their hearing loss is sensory, they will remain prospects for the rest of their lives. Make sure to include an internal marketing program for such prospects, as there will be many opportunities to help them. Patients who have lived with the gradual onset of hearing loss often have difficulty understanding what it would be like to hear well again. Demonstrating the actual benefits of improved hearing can be a very effective way to convince a patient to do something about their problem. Too often, we tell patients what they should do, but fail to have them and their family members actually experience what better hearing sounds like. Communicate frequently with patients and prospects: Given the information overload we all deal with, it's easy for current patients to forget about us if we don't stay in touch. While it is possible to communicate too frequently, especially if we only correspond when we want to sell something, patients want to hear from us. Start a patient-recall program and contact patients when it's time for their annual hearing test. Or send notes when you haven't heard from them in over 6 months. Ask patients for their opinion. Kochkin reported in his MarkeTrak studies that consumers who received any form of post-fitting survey were generally more satisfied with their hearing instruments. If your practice or organization isn't growing, take another look at your business plan and don't hesitate to make some adjustments.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,010
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,051
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,172

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0100,062
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0120,010
Communication savante0,0160,024
Science ouverte0,0030,007
Intégrité de la recherche0,0100,024
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0510,017

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,484
Tête enseignante GPT0,471
Écart entre enseignants0,014 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2009
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Hearing JournalMême sujetComplex Systems and Decision MakingTravaux en français237 207