Ministerium Justitiae: Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Official Latin with English Translation (review)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Reviewed by: Ministerium Justitiae: Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Official Latin with English Translation John J. Coughlin O.F.M. Ministerium Justitiae: Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura, Official Latin with English Translation, translated by William L. Daniel, Foreword by Raymond Cardinal Burke. Montreal: Wilson & Lafleur, 2011. The decisions of any legal system's supreme judicial organ constitute a significant aspect of that legal system's procedural and substantive law. The jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura counts as no exception. Although the decisions of ecclesiastical tribunals do not hold strict precedential value in the system of canon law, such decisions nonetheless often exert a formative influence in shaping future tribunal decisions and in the development of canon law itself. For this reason, canonists pay close attention to the decrees of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura. William L. Daniel's collection of the Signatura's decrees represents an important contribution to a better understanding of the supreme tribunal's jurisprudence and its influence on the life of the Roman Catholic Church. The collection of some 58 decrees of the Apostolic Signatura, spanning the years 1983 to 2007, has been organized into three major sections in accord with the three principal competencies of the Signatura. Based upon Canon 1445 (CIC-1983), the 1988 Apostolic Constitution Pastor Bonus recognized three sections of the Signatura. The First Section of the Signatura exercises a judicial function, and as a major portion of this function, it hears appeals from the decisions of the Roman Rota. Part I of MINISTERIUM JUSTITIAE contains three decrees of the Signatura. The first of the decrees concerns a petition for restitutio in integrum, [End Page 314] and the decree explains how restitutio differs from an ordinary appeal. The second decree, contained in Part I, discusses the critical function that the right of defense plays in marriage nullity cases. A third relatively brief decree entails the convalidation of marriage. Part II of MINISTERIUM JUSTITIAE culls 25 decrees of the Apostolic Signatura that pertain to the contentious-administrative process in canon law. The so-called "Second Section" of the Signatura hears petitions against the decrees of certain of the Dicasteries of the Roman Curia. The Signatura decisions offered in Part II focus on the dismissal of religious, the transfer and removal of parish priests, and the suppression of parishes. Part II also includes Signatura decrees concerning a conflict of competence between two Dicasteries, the dismissal of a professor from an ecclesiastical university, a conflict between a bishop's decree and pontifical privilege, a penalty imposed on a layperson, and the suppression of an association of the Christian faithful. In Part III, MINISTERIUM JUSTITIAE presents 19 decrees which flow from the disciplinary-administrative function of the Apostolic Signatura. Many of these decrees treat special competencies granted to appellate and local tribunals. The decrees contained in MINISTERIUM JUSTITIAE appear in original Latin versions with accurate English translations. The scholarly appendages of the book prove helpful in locating particular topics and specific decisions. Both the Foreword by His Eminence Raymond Cardinal Burke and the Introduction by William Daniel afford insight about the crucial ministry of the Signatura. This book promises to serve as a treasured resource for all those interested in justice in the Church. John J. Coughlin O.F.M. New York, NY Copyright © 2012 The Catholic University of America Press
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».