MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2325954509 · doi:10.5435/jaaos-21-04-258

Synovial Stem Cells in Musculoskeletal Regeneration

2013· article· en· W2325954509 sur OpenAlexaff
Kıvanç Ateşok, Nedim M. Doral, Onur Bilge, Ichiro Sekiya

Notice bibliographique

RevueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOsteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
Établissements canadiensUniversity of Toronto
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMesenchymal stem cellSynovial membraneMedicineCell biologyCell typeCD90PathologySynovial jointCD44Stem cell transplantation for articular cartilage repairCartilageStem cellCellOsteoarthritisInflammationAnatomyCellular differentiationImmunologyAdult stem cellBiologyCD34

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The synovium is a thin layer of connective tissue that lines the joint surface, tendon sheaths, and bursae at freely moving articulations in the body. Embryologic origin of the synovial tissue is the mesenchymal layer, which also gives rise to bone, cartilage, ligament, and muscle tissue. The synovium has several functions, including lubrication of the articulating surfaces, nutrition of articular cartilage, and regulation of immune response within the joint. Synovial Cells The synovium contains two main cell types: type A and type B synoviocytes. Type A synoviocytes are tissue macrophages and have phagocytic functions. Type B synoviocytes are fibroblast-like cells and function in the formation of synovial fluid.1 In 2001, De Bari et al2 isolated mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) from the synovium (Figure 1). Type A synoviocytes can be characterized and eliminated from mixed synovial cell populations through a selective culturing process. However, type B synoviocytes and synovial-MSCs have similar phenotypic features, and specific characteristics to clearly differentiate these two cell types from each other have not been determined yet.1Figure 1: Histologic appearance of human synovial mesenchymal stem cells under the phase contrast microscope 14 days after initial plating.In terms of immune phenotype, there are many similarities between synovial-MSCs and MSCs of other origins. Both cell types are positive for surface markers such as CD44, CD90, and CD105. However, cells derived from synovium, including synovial-MSCs, have higher expression of CD44 (a hyaluronan receptor) and can express uridine diphosphoglucose dehydrogenase, which is a vital enzyme involved in hyaluronan synthesis.3 In vitro studies have shown that synovial-MSCs have superior potential to differentiate into chondrocytes and to produce cartilage compared with MSCs of other origins.4 Moreover, synovial-MSCs have greater proliferation and colony-forming capacity than do other stem cell sources.4 Synovial-MSCs and Cartilage Regeneration Based on the promising results from in vitro studies, investigators have launched animal model studies to evaluate the effects of synovial-MSCs in vivo. In a rabbit model with full-thickness articular cartilage defect, Koga et al5 demonstrated that local transplantation of synovial-MSCs results in extensive cartilage matrix formation at the defect site. These authors also observed that in the deeper zone of the defect, synovial-MSCs differentiated into bone cells, whereas synovial-MSCs at the superficial zones differentiated into chondrocytes. This observation supported the multilineage differentiation potential of synovial-MSCs according to local microenvironments in vivo. In a pig model, transplantation of synovial-MSCs into a full-thickness articular cartilage defect promoted cartilage regeneration based on arthroscopic, MRI, and histologic analysis as early as 3 months after the procedure.6 Bilge et al7 used a rabbit knee model as an in vivo culture medium to evaluate the effects of synovium on chondrocyte growth. These authors observed that cartilage grafts that are in direct contact with the synovium produce more chondrocytes compared with cartilage grafts that are not. Studies of animal meniscal defect models demonstrated that transplanted synovial-MSCs adhere to sites of meniscal injury, differentiate into cells resembling meniscal fibrochondrocytes, and enhance meniscal regeneration.8,9 Sporadic human studies have reported that the number of synovial-MSCs in synovial fluid increases in knees with degenerated cartilage and osteoarthritis and following intraarticular ligament injury.10,11 This observation raises the question whether the number of synovial-MSCs that are mobilized from synovium into synovial fluid increases according to the degree of cartilage degeneration as part of the reparative process. Human trials investigating the effects of intra-articular synovial-MSC transplantation to promote cartilage regeneration and/or to prevent osteoarthritis should answer this question. Application of Synovial-MSCs for Bone, Tendon, and Muscle Regeneration Synovial-MSCs may offer an alternative cell-based treatment strategy for bone, tendon, and muscle regeneration. In a rabbit bone defect model, Matsusaki et al12 demonstrated that using tissue-engineered construct derived from synovial-MSCs with hydroxyapatite accelerates osteoinduction. In a rat Achilles tendon graft model, synovial-MSC implantation into bone tunnel accelerated early remodeling of tendon-to-bone healing.13 Another rat model study showed that synovial-MSCs have myogenic potential and contribute to skeletal muscle regeneration in vivo.14 In spite of these reports, there is not sufficient evidence regarding osteogenic and myogenic potential of synovial-MSCs compared with bone marrow- and muscle-derived MSCs. Future Perspectives In vitro and animal model studies support the use of synovial-MSCs in cartilage regeneration as an important, arguably superior, cell-based treatment alternative. Further investigations in the near future should help in our understanding the complexity of synovial-MSC biology in terms of isolation, characterization, culturing, distinguishing from, and interacting with other cell types before this promising cell-based therapy can be translated into clinical practice.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,012

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,269
Écart entre enseignants0,254 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations8
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueJournal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic SurgeonsMême sujetOsteoarthritis Treatment and MechanismsTravaux en français237 207