Abstract A050: ARRY-380, an oral HER2 inhibitor: Final phase 1 results and conclusions
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Overexpression of HER2 occurs in ~25% of breast cancers. Despite the treatment successes achieved to date, improved clinical outcomes remain needed, including prevention and treatment of CNS metastases. Small-molecule HER2 inhibitors may have the advantage of being able to treat CNS and systemic disease simultaneously, particularly if used in combination with antibody-based therapy. However, currently available small molecules also target EGFR, with associated use limiting toxicities. Therefore, a specific small-molecule inhibitor of HER2 is needed. ARRY-380 is an oral, potent, reversible, ATP competitive, small molecule inhibitor of HER2. In cell-based assays, ARRY-380 was ~500-fold selective for HER2 versus EGFR. In multiple preclinical models, ARRY-380 demonstrated significant single agent and combination activity. In models of CNS disease, ARRY-380 was highly active as a single agent and demonstrated superior activity compared to lapatinib or neratinib. Thus, ARRY-380 was evaluated in a first in human clinical study. Methods: A Phase 1 clinical study of ARRY-380 was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors that are believed to express HER2, with both dose-escalation (25 to 800 mg BID) and MTD expansion components. ARRY-380 was administered BID in 28 day cycles. Safety was assessed by AEs, clinical laboratory test results, physical examinations, vital signs and ECGs. Tumor response was assessed by RECIST every 2 cycles. Serial PK assessments were conducted in Cycle 1 on Days 1 and 3 and at steady state on Day 15. Results: A total of 50 patients were enrolled (33 dose-escalation and 17 expansion). These results focus on the 31 patients treated at doses ≥ MTD: 27 at the MTD of 600/650 mg BID and 4 at 800 mg BID. All 31 patients had HER2+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) that had progressed on a prior trastuzumab containing regimen and 94% had received prior lapatinib, many who progressed on treatment. Dose limiting toxicity consisting of reversible Grade (G) 3 AST (n=1) and AST/ALT elevations (n=1) occurred in 2 of 4 patients treated at 800 mg BID, with an onset that occurred within 1 week, resolved within 2 weeks, and patients resumed treatment at a lower dose. Overall, ARRY-380 demonstrated an acceptable safety profile at the MTD. The most common treatment-related AEs were nausea, diarrhea, fatigue, vomiting, liver enzyme elevations and rash, and were primarily G1 with a low incidence of G2 (gastrointestinal events [n=2], fatigue [n=3], liver enzyme elevations [n=2]) or G3 (rash [n=1], liver enzyme elevations [n=1]) events. There were no treatment-related cardiac events, serious AEs or G4 AEs. ARRY-380 Cmax and AUC increased with increasing dose, with a Tmax of 2 hours and a t1/2 of 5 hours. Twenty-two HER2+ MBC patients with measurable disease were treated with ARRY-380 at doses ≥ 600 mg BID. In this heavily pretreated population, there was a clinical benefit rate (PR [n=3] plus SD for at least 6 months [n=3]) of 27%. Notably, 2 patients with PRs on ARRY-380 had confirmed progressions while on prior lapatinib- and trastuzumab-containing regimens. Conclusions: ARRY-380 has demonstrated an acceptable safety and PK profile at the MTD. As predicted for a HER2-selective agent that does not inhibit EGFR, there was a very low incidence of Grade 2/3 rash and diarrhea. ARRY-380 has shown promising signs of antitumor activity in a heavily pretreated HER2+ MBC population. These safety and preliminary efficacy data support the continued clinical development of ARRY-380 at the recommended dose of 600 mg BID. Citation Format: Virginia F. Borges, Steven K.L Chia, Susan D'Aloisio, Gina Fernetich, Bessie Sajan, Tessa McSpadden, Renae Chavira, Emma Barrett, Kari Guthrie, Jennifer Garrus, Tara Baetz, Stacy Moulder. ARRY-380, an oral HER2 inhibitor: Final phase 1 results and conclusions. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Breast Cancer Research: Genetics, Biology, and Clinical Applications; Oct 3-6, 2013; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2013;11(10 Suppl):Abstract nr A050.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».