China's ecological steps forward

In their Report “A mid-term analysis of progress toward international biodiversity targets” (10 October, p. [241][1]; published online 2 October), D. P. Tittensor and colleagues concluded that despite accelerating policy and management responses to the biodiversity crisis on a global scale, these efforts are unlikely to improve the state of biodiversity by 2020. They did not acknowledge that sustained national policies in China have already produced positive effects on biodiversity. The Chinese government initiated in 1999 the Natural Forest Resources Conservation Program and the Restoring Farmland into Forest Program. Logging has been prohibited in most natural forests, and cultivated land on areas with slopes of more than 25 degrees must be restored to forests or grasslands ([ 1 ][2]). The central government subsidized forest management and conservation, as well as seedling cultivation and reforestation ([ 2 ][3], [ 3 ][4]). Households that have returned their cultivated land to forests received subsidies from the central government ([ 2 ][3], [ 3 ][4]). Recently, the State Council updated the policies and increased subsidies to further promote ecosystem restoration ([ 2 ][3]). A number of other key ecological programs continue to be implemented, such as forest belt construction in the Yangtze River basin. More than US$80 billion has been invested in these programs ([ 1 ][2]). Ecological conditions have improved ([ 2 ][3]). Forest area, growing stock (the total stock volume of trees growing in land), and coverage rate (the percentage of area of afforested land compared with total land) all increased between 2009 and 2013 ([ 4 ][5]–[ 6 ][6]). These programs have contributed to progress toward Aichi Targets 5, 14, and 15 ([ 2 ][3]), although these policies need to be fine-tuned to best fit the local environment. 1. [↵][7] Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Global Biodiversity Outlook 4 (Montreal, 2014). 2. [↵][8] Ministry of Environmental Protection, “China's 5th national report to the CBD” ([www.cbd.int/doc/world/cn/cn-nr-05-en.pdf][9]). 3. [↵][10] 1. P. W. Leadley 2. et al ., “Progress towards the aichi biodiversity targets: An assessment of biodiversity trends, policy scenarios, and key actions” (Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal, 2014). 4. [↵][11] State Forestry Administration, “China Forestry Statistics” (China Forestry Press, Beijing, 2013). 5. State Forestry Administration, “The promulgation of the eighth national forest resource inventory” ([www.forestry.gov.cn/][12]). 6. [↵][13] 1. H. Xu 2. et al ., BioScience 59, 843 (2009). [OpenUrl][14][Abstract/FREE Full Text][15] [1]: /lookup/doi/10.1126/science.1257484 [2]: #ref-1 [3]: #ref-2 [4]: #ref-3 [5]: #ref-4 [6]: #ref-6 [7]: #xref-ref-1-1 View reference 1 in text [8]: #xref-ref-2-1 View reference 2 in text [9]: http://www.cbd.int/doc/world/cn/cn-nr-05-en.pdf [10]: #xref-ref-3-1 View reference 3 in text [11]: #xref-ref-4-1 View reference 4 in text [12]: http://www.forestry.gov.cn/ [13]: #xref-ref-6-1 View reference 6 in text [14]: {openurl}?query=rft.jtitle%253DBioScience%26rft_id%253Dinfo%253Adoi%252F10.1525%252Fbio.2009.59.10.6%26rft.genre%253Darticle%26rft_val_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Ajournal%26ctx_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ver%253DZ39.88-2004%26url_ctx_fmt%253Dinfo%253Aofi%252Ffmt%253Akev%253Amtx%253Actx [15]: /lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6MTA6ImJpb3NjaWVuY2UiO3M6NToicmVzaWQiO3M6OToiNTkvMTAvODQzIjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjM6Ii9zY2kvMzQ2LzYyMTMvMTA2OC5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.