MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2327100614 · doi:10.5858/arpa.2014-0362-ed

Keeping Pace With New Frontiers in Pathology

2014· article· en· W2327100614 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Joel K. Greenson, Jeffrey L. Myers

Notice bibliographique

RevueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueRadiology practices and education
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPaceCertificationRespondentMaintenance of CertificationLifelong learningMedicineContinuing medical educationMedical educationThe InternetPublic relationsContinuing educationPsychologyComputer sciencePolitical scienceWorld Wide Web

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Lifelong learning is embedded in the definition of pathology as the study of diseases and the changes they cause.1 Demonstrating a regular commitment to lifelong learning through continuing education and self-assessment is a key component of the maintenance of certification programs that are in turn driven by public expectations that physicians will provide care predicated on knowledge and standards that are current and appropriately applied. The challenge, of course, is keeping pace with these expectations in an age in which information rapidly expands, is available globally, and is regularly refreshed through the power of the Internet and peer-reviewed publications like the Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine.Pathologists have access to multiple information sources intended to help them stay current with translational discoveries and changes likely to have an impact on daily practice. In addition to traditional sources like clinically focused journals and textbooks, there is a growing portfolio of Web-based solutions available online either for purchase or at no charge. And yet, pathologist respondents to a recent survey predicted that pathologists entering the field today will continue to have an appetite for continuing medical education (CME) delivered in person, with one respondent saying that in-person CME is “valuable as a chance to interface with colleagues and share ideas” (United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology – unpublished data). Meetings in which experts deliver updated content come in multiple shapes and sizes, including not only meetings sponsored by major pathology organizations but also smaller meetings sponsored by smaller pathology societies, commercial CME providers, and pathology departments based in academic medical centers. Choosing one over another is likely driven by a combination of factors, including not only the reputation and experience of the meeting organizer and content providers, but also convenience, travel costs, competing priorities, and the desirability of the destination.This issue of the Archives includes a special section populated by manuscripts drawn from the proceedings of the New Frontiers in Pathology (NFP) workshop held in Ann Arbor, Michigan, in September 2013. NFP is a two-and-a-half-day workshop, now in its eighth year, hosted by the Department of Pathology at the University of Michigan. NFP is held in the magnificent Rackham Building on the main campus in the fall, a particularly pretty time to appreciate the hard woods for which Ann Arbor was named. The Rackham Building houses the Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studies, a community of scholars, researchers, and students in nearly 200 programs at the University of Michigan, making it a perfect setting in which to learn from peers and colleagues. The program includes plenary lectures that showcase the interface between research and practice, case-based presentations highlighting differential diagnoses of practical importance for which digital whole slide images are available, and less formal breakout sessions in which smaller groups explore subspecialty topics with University of Michigan faculty.The special section in this issue is a collaborative project between the editor-in-chief and editorial staff of the Archives and the Department of Pathology at the University of Michigan. Our common goal is to make available updated material likely to be of interest to practicing pathologists. The manuscripts in this special section are representative of material presented at our 2013 NFP meeting and were selected from more than 30 different presentations. Unique case-based diagnostic challenges in urologic pathology include pseudocarcinomatous hyperplasia of the urinary bladder by Angela Wu; inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors by Megan Alderman and Lakshmi P. Kunju; diagnosis and subclassification of renal cell carcinomas by Madelyn Lew and colleagues; and lymphoma of the prostate by Joshua I. Warrick, Scott R. Owens, and Scott A. Tomlins. Entities with the potential for diagnostic misadventure in any practice that sees hematopathology problems are reviewed in papers focusing on anaplastic large cell lymphomas by Maria A. Pletneva and Lauren B. Smith; splenic B-cell lymphomas by Amir Behdad and Nathanael G. Bailey; transient abnormal myelopoieses in neonates by Melissa Bombery and Jo-Anne Vergilio; and cutaneous T-cell lymphomas as well as their inflammatory mimics in separate papers by Thanh T. Ha Lan et al and David P. Arps et al, respectively. Other dermatopathology topics that were covered at our 2013 meeting and expanded in this special section include a case-based review of clear cell cutaneous neoplasms by Maria A. Pletneva and colleagues, and an overview of neutrophilic panniculitis, a heterogeneous group of disorders, by May P. Chan. Julie Jorns in collaboration with Michael S. Sabel and Judy C. Pang uses 3 cases to review the morphologic spectrum of lobular neoplasia in the breast. Finally, Amir Behdad and Scott R. Owens present a unique case of extranodal Langerhans cell histiocytosis and use it to summarize evolving information regarding molecular pathogenesis and novel treatment strategies for this uncommon entity.Special sections like the proceedings of our annual CME conference contained in this issue of the Archives are one of many options available to pathologists confronted with the challenge of keeping pace with the exploding knowledge base. We are grateful to the editors and publishers of the Archives for making it possible, and to all of the participating faculty and attendees responsible for the continued success of NFP.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,032
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,062
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,035
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,169

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0320,062
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0030,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0040,009
Communication savante0,0230,029
Science ouverte0,0030,013
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,013
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0350,020

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,012
Tête enseignante GPT0,279
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueArchives of Pathology & Laboratory MedicineMême sujetRadiology practices and educationTravaux en français237 207