MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2327161452

The Case for Intercultural Education in a Multicultural World

2016· article· en· W2327161452 sur OpenAlex

Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

venuePublié dans une revue dont le pays d'attache est le Canada.
aboutLe titre ou le résumé porte un signal canadien du lexique géographique.
no affAucune affiliation canadienne : ce travail est invisible pour une base fondée sur la seule affiliation.
Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Notice bibliographique

RevueCanadian Journal of Education / Revue canadienne de l éducation · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueSocial Development and Education Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDisadvantagedMulticulturalismDisadvantageMulticultural educationEquity (law)SociologyImmigrationSocial sciencePedagogyPublic relationsPolitical scienceGender studiesLaw
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Case for Intercultural Education in a Multicultural World by Jagdish Gundare Oakville, Ontario: Mosaic Press, 2015, 246 pages ISBN: 978-0-88962-936-3 (paperback) The Case for Intercultural Education in a Multicultural World, by Dr. Jagdish Gundara, discusses the intercultural challenges to be found in increasingly complex and unstable multicultural societies in the UK and Europe. The central thesis of the book is that the marginalization of minority groups is paralleled by declining educational opportunity among immigrants and poorer social classes, yielding grave consequences. Dr. Gundara's book is a timely publication. In recent years there has been a burgeoning interest in the socio-cultural processes that promote outcome-equity among students who come from conditions of socio-economic adversity or cultural disadvantage (as seen in the work of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, 2011). Such students are often described as at risk, a term that means to be in jeopardy of disaffection (at best), and encompasses all aspects of the social and personal that contribute to social dysfunction and academic failure. As one reads Dr. Gundara's book, one is reminded that the challenges across each nation, community, and case-study are unique. Yet, every public school teacher who works alongside socially disadvantaged families and children plays an identical role as a gate-keeper who prevents the social and economic inequities that threaten and diminish the life-chances of their students. There can be no doubting the credentials and experience of Dr. Gundara, but the question remains--to what extent does this collection of do the author justice? This review is written with the greatest of respect for the author's career accomplishments, but it is of course essential to maintain objectivity where the subject matter is concerned. For European nations, which are the focus of Gundara's considerations, the way forward is to reconcile the cultural and social differences in communities, institutions, and societies. For the author, the resolution resides in a trans-historical curricula that creates unifying world-knowledges among people from varied economic and cultural backgrounds. This review was written on the same day that Time Magazine and The Financial Times awarded German Chancellor Angela Merkel the Person of the Year Award in recognition of her policy on immigration from the war-torn state of Syria. For both Gundara, and for some European politicians, multiculturalism has created something of a bleak social vista replete with oppression, inequity, and social instability requiring reactionary practices by the authorities. Merkel's recent public condemnation of multiculturalism further clarifies Gundara's observations on multiculturalism as an unsuccessful social construct. What, then, shall we do? This is the question that the reader would expect Dr. Gundara to answer. The collection of essays continuously reminds the reader that while the challenges across each nation and community are unique, they often arise from common histories. Of central thematic importance throughout is the need for trans-historical education and social policy agendas that promote open discussion about cultural differences designed to foster inter-subjectivity and consensus. It is also a timely contribution because of an intensification of interest in outcome equity across recent years due to the expansion of enrollment in public education worldwide (United Nations, 2010)--but timing is not everything. Neither individually nor collectively do the essays adequately address how deep divisions born of centuries of conflict and oppression may be redressed by schools and colleges (for example, in the schools of Paris where Muslims rioted in 2005, 2007, and 2013). As one might expect from an accomplished academic, the essays in the collection are well crafted, yet weakened by a lack of transparency. …

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,843
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,996

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,005
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,073
Tête enseignante GPT0,369
Écart entre enseignants0,297 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle