MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2327290317 · doi:10.1017/s0021911811002804

Indian Female Gurus in Contemporary Hinduism: A Study of Central Aspects and Expressions of Their Religious Leadership. By Marie-Thérèse Charpentier. Åbo: Åbo Akademi University Press, 2010. 394 pp. €56,25.

2012· article· en· W2327290317 sur OpenAlexaff
Ellen Goldberg

Notice bibliographique

RevueThe Journal of Asian Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineArts and Humanities
ThématiqueMedia, Religion, Digital Communication
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésHinduismSociologyTheologyReligious studiesHistoryPhilosophy

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Marie-Thérèse Charpentier offers a detailed and intimate series of portraits of four female gurus (gurvī) living in contemporary India. She marries ethnography and gender studies with William E. Paden's comparative approach to the history of religions (religionswissenschaft) to generate what she calls a macroscopic understanding of the overlooked phenomenon or patterns of female guruhood in India today. She argues that female guruhood as well as female spiritual leadership stands in sharp contrast to the various stereotypes of female subordination that we often see in orthodox Hindu religion, particularly the textual tradition where women are typically expected to be “passive,” “submissive,” and “worship their husbands as Gods” (p. 14). Furthermore, she points out that as a category of human religiosity, female gurus have been typically neglected or treated asymmetrically vis-à-vis male gurus and draws on the recent work of Karen Pechilis, Lisa Hallstrom, Daniel Gold, Maya Warrier, Meena Khandelwal, and others to frame her discussion.Charpentier's rather lengthy study is organized into nine chapters beginning with a historical survey of the guru paradigm in Hindu tradition from its first use in the Chāndogya Upaniṣad (VIII.15.1) to its centrality in tantric traditions. By relaying the stories of four female gurus: Madhobi Ma (1954–) from Delhi; Anandmurti Gurumaa (1966–) from Haryana; Sai Rajarajeshwari (1947-) from Karnataka; and Shakti Devi (1953–) from Tamil Nadu through participant-observer strategies including in-depth interviews, hagiographies, biographies and devotee testimonials, as well as drawing on seventy additional ethnographies of female gurus surveyed between 1999–2006, Charpentier documents the growing presence and day-to-day concerns of female spiritual leadership across India. We learn about who these female gurus are, what draws women in India to the spiritual path and how their families respond to their explicit religious experiences including trance states, fits, hearing voices, precognitive dreams, performing miracles, healing the sick, and transmission of energy. Drawing on this data, the author charts significant patterns of psychological and religious aptitude among women and develops strategies for analysis using a variety of categories including varṇa, education, and location to flesh out constructive identities of female leadership. Charpentier frequently cross-references her subjects thereby adding to the rich history of biographical narrative traced in her book.Chapters 5, 6, and 7 address issues relevant to female spiritual leadership such as marriage and celibacy, householdership (gṛhastha) versus renunciation (sannyāsinī), tensions between the public and private spheres, access to scriptural and oral authority, transmission of śaktipāta, lineage and religious affiliation, the centrality of motherhood and issues of embodiment, and charisma. Charpentier is aware that in these particular spheres of influence the role of the female guru is often a traditional role. However, female religious leaders require both traditional underpinnings as well as innovation. The author's ability to distinguish between these shifting markers shows how female gurus navigate ‘the spiritual’ and ‘the social’ in conservative as well as in radical and transgressive ways. The author portrays her subjects as ultimately challenging “restrictive social conventions of gender” and the “norms of womanhood” (strīdharma) in order to claim for themselves independent lives dedicated to self-realization and God. Though many of the women Charpentier studies display ambivalence and/or conservatism concerning the rules of hierarchy and varṇāśramadharma, as well as restrictions for ritual impurity (menstruation) and pardā and could therefore be called “traditional” or “conservative” (p. 265), others demonstrate a decidedly progressive or modern view by standing up against discrimination, the “brutal treatment of girls”, and practices such as “female infanticide and foeticide” (p. 276). It seems that by all accounts emerging roles for women in the public religious sphere are as varied as those held by men.Female Gurus in Contemporary Hinduism is an important study documenting the ‘lived’ experiences of women in respected positions of leadership. As such, it is recommended for anyone studying female religiosity in contemporary India either at the graduate or undergraduate level. The volume includes an extensive index of Indian female gurus living in India, as well as related internet and textual sources, a list of all of the aśramas visited by the author, a helpful table outlining personal details including varṇa, maritial status and education of the gurus interviewed, and a glossary of terms. Finally, this study would be useful to practitioners of Hinduism who are interested in living female religious leaders.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,099
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,536

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,001
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,137
Tête enseignante GPT0,271
Écart entre enseignants0,133 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueThe Journal of Asian StudiesMême sujetMedia, Religion, Digital CommunicationTravaux en français237 207