241 DETERMINATION OF THE ACCURACY OF FDG-PET/CT IN THE PRIMARY STAGING OF BIOLOGICAL HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCERS BEFORE LOCAL THERAPIES: INCREASED UPTAKE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHLY AGGRESSIVE TUMORS
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Staging (I)1 Apr 2013241 DETERMINATION OF THE ACCURACY OF FDG-PET/CT IN THE PRIMARY STAGING OF BIOLOGICAL HIGH RISK PROSTATE CANCERS BEFORE LOCAL THERAPIES: INCREASED UPTAKE ASSOCIATED WITH HIGHLY AGGRESSIVE TUMORS Annie-Claude Blouin, Goran Rimac, Frédéric Bouchard, Claude Lemay, Vincent Fradet, André Caron, Yves Fradet, Louis Lacombe, Thierry Dujardin, Rabi Tigert, Jean-Mathieu Beauregard, and Frédéric Pouliot Annie-Claude BlouinAnnie-Claude Blouin Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Goran RimacGoran Rimac Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Frédéric BouchardFrédéric Bouchard Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Claude LemayClaude Lemay Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Vincent FradetVincent Fradet Québec, Canada More articles by this author , André CaronAndré Caron Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Yves FradetYves Fradet Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Louis LacombeLouis Lacombe Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Thierry DujardinThierry Dujardin Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Rabi TigertRabi Tigert Québec, Canada More articles by this author , Jean-Mathieu BeauregardJean-Mathieu Beauregard Québec, Canada More articles by this author , and Frédéric PouliotFrédéric Pouliot Québec, Canada More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.1621AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES Cancer staging with FDG-PET/CT is accurate for many cancers but not for prostate cancers (PCa) based on early studies on heterogeneous cohorts of patients. However, in more recent studies, FDG-PET/CT was shown to be as accurate as 18F-Choline-PET/CT in recurrent and metastatic PCa. Moreover, it was shown that glucose metabolism enzymes were overexpressed in high Gleason sum PCa. We therefore hypothesized that FDG-PET/CT might be useful in the initial staging of biological high risk PCa (Gleason ≥8) before local therapies. METHODS Last year, 54 patients with Gleason sum ≥8 at biopsy underwent a FDG-PET/CT and a bone scan as initial staging procedures. 41 patients then underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) and bilateral pelvic lymph node dissection, while 13 patients received androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone or a combination of ADT and radiation therapy. Increased FDG uptake for each organ was defined as our detection rate. RESULTS At biopsy, 73 and 27% of patients had Gleason sum 8 and 9, pre-operative PSA was 16 ng/mL (median = 7.5) and 34, 34, 26 and 6% of patients had clinical stages T1, T2, T3 or T4. Increased FDG uptake was found in the prostate, lymph nodes (LN) and bones of 44, 15 and 6% of patients. Bone scan was positive in the 3 patients that had bone FDG uptake. In the operated patients cohort, using RP pathological specimens, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were 27, 100, 100 and 78% for LN metastasis. On univariate analysis (RP group), higher clinical stage, pathological Gleason sum and pattern and the presence of perineural invasion were significantly associated with intraprostatic FDG uptake (all p < 0.037). Patients without FDG uptake in the prostate were downstaged to Gleason ≤ 7 in 72.4% of cases at RP (vs 18.4% for increased uptake, p=0.0001). None of the patients downstaged to Gleason 6(3+3) nor 7(3+4) at pathology had an increased FDG uptake in the prostate while 62,5 and 100% of patients with Gleason 8 or 9 did (p = 0.01). Moreover, FDG-PET/CT LN positivity was associated with higher pathological stage, Gleason sum, positive LN,LN density, and the presence of seminal vesicle invasion (all p < 0.044). CONCLUSIONS Our results suggest for the first time that FDG-PET/CT is highly specific for PCa metastasis and may identify intraprostatic pathological downstaging in biologically high risk patients. Therefore, we demonstrate a possible prognostic and staging role for FDG-PET/CT in high-risk prostate cancers imaged before primary therapies. © 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 189Issue 4SApril 2013Page: e99-e100 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2013 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Annie-Claude Blouin Québec, Canada More articles by this author Goran Rimac Québec, Canada More articles by this author Frédéric Bouchard Québec, Canada More articles by this author Claude Lemay Québec, Canada More articles by this author Vincent Fradet Québec, Canada More articles by this author André Caron Québec, Canada More articles by this author Yves Fradet Québec, Canada More articles by this author Louis Lacombe Québec, Canada More articles by this author Thierry Dujardin Québec, Canada More articles by this author Rabi Tigert Québec, Canada More articles by this author Jean-Mathieu Beauregard Québec, Canada More articles by this author Frédéric Pouliot Québec, Canada More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,002 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,009 | 0,004 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».