MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2327595310 · doi:10.1097/aln.0b013e31824be8e1

Postoperative Cognitive Decline

2012· letter· en· W2327595310 sur OpenAlexaff
Roderic G. Eckenhoff, Emmanuel Planel

Notice bibliographique

RevueAnesthesiology · 2012
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueIntensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
Établissements canadiensCentre hospitalier de l'Université Laval
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCognitive declineCognitionPostoperative cognitive dysfunctionIntensive care medicineInternal medicinePsychiatryDementiaDisease

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

TAU is an axonal microtubule-associated protein whose best known function is to bind and stabilize microtubules and promote their polymerization. Tau, a variously sized protein, has a number of repeated domains that bind tubulin and a number of phosphorylation sites that modulate its affinity for tubulin. In general, phosphorylation through a number of kinases decreases tau affinity to microtubules, whereas phosphatase activity dephosphorylates and increases affinity, resulting in tubulin binding and microtubule stabilization.1“[This work] allows the hypothesis that tau and perhaps microtubule dysfunction may underlie altered cognition after surgery.” In Alzheimer disease and other tauopathies, tau becomes abnormally hyperphosphorylated and self-assembles into a number of higher-order structures, resulting in fibrillar-paired helical filaments, the core components of the classic intracellular neurofibrillary tangles.2How hyperphosphorylated tau, paired helical filaments, or neurofibrillary tangles go on to cause or contribute to cellular and synaptic dysfunction is not entirely clear,3but the correlation with the ultimate cognitive deficits is better than with other neuropathologic lesions, such as the amyloid plaque.4,5That the state of anesthesia can result in tau hyperphosphorylation was sprung on us a few years ago by Planel et al. ,6but we breathed a collective sigh of relief when it was carefully demonstrated that anesthesia-associated hypothermia was the culprit, rather than the drug itself, and that the effects were quickly reversible. The article in this month's ANESTHESIOLOGY by Le Freche et al. suggests we may have relaxed too soon.7Le Freche et al. exposed wild type mice to two concentrations of sevoflurane for 1 h once a month for 5 months starting at 5 months of age. There was no surgery. Immediately after the first exposure, phosphorylated tau was increased in the brain but not after 24 h. However, sometime between this first exposure and the fifth exposure, the effect on phosphorylated tau concentrations in the brain were no longer transient. A full month after the last exposure, phosphorylated tau in the hippocampus was increased dramatically, and the putative responsible kinases were identified. This is of interest because hypothermia-associated elevations in phosphorylated tau were associated with decreases in phosphatase activity, rather than activation of kinases. In addition, anesthetics may directly bind to and alter tubulin, promoting both tau release and microtubule dysfunction.8Thus, although this area remains understudied, anesthesia and its associated physiology might produce multiple hits on the tau and tubulin pathway.The work by Le Freche et al. is not the first time that persistent changes in tau have been identified after anesthesia. Elevations in insoluble tau and phosphorylated tau were found weeks to months after isoflurane anesthesia in mouse models of either tauopathy or Alzheimer disease.9,10Moreover, there is evidence for translation to humans. Tang et al. found increased tau and phosphorylated tau in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients as long as 48 h after endoscopic surgery with propofol/remifentanyl or sevoflurane anesthesia,11and Palotás et al. , found increased total tau as long as 6 months after coronary artery bypass graft surgery performed during total intravenous anesthesia.12Although it is impossible to determine causality in these early clinical studies, it seems that a case for perioperative modulation of tau is emerging.So what? Tau is modulated physiologically. For example, phosphorylated tau is increased during fetal and neonatal development, where it is thought to contribute to the less-stable neuronal cytoskeleton required in periods of neuronal growth and plasticity.13Le Freche et al. anticipate this question by performing cognitive studies on their mice between the fourth and fifth sevoflurane exposures. Using the Morris water maze, they find that working memory is not different from that of controls, but memory retention is diminished significantly in the sevoflurane-exposed animals.Unlike the researchers of the human studies, Le Freche et al. are able to link the anesthetic alone with both phosphorylated tau and memory effects. But as with the human studies, they are unable to make the link between phosphorylated tau and the memory effects. At this point, it is simply an intriguing association, but it allows the hypothesis that tau and perhaps microtubule dysfunction may underlie altered cognition after surgery. Direct tests of this idea are possible in animals, such as in tau knockout mice, but would be difficult in humans. Perhaps searching for parallel rank order effects of different anesthetics might allow some linkage, as might pre- or cotreatment with a variety of compounds that stabilize microtubules. The small molecule Epothilone D and the octapeptide NAPVSIPQ are examples of microtubule-stabilizing compounds that delay onset of pathology and symptoms in neurodegenerative animal models and soon will be entering clinical Alzheimer trials.14,15It would be interesting if such drugs found a place in perioperative medicine in the future.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesMéta-épidémiologie (sens strict), Intégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesIntégrité de la recherche, Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Commentaire · Signal consensuel: Commentaire
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,044
Score d'incertitude au seuil1,000

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,003
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,003

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,292
Écart entre enseignants0,268 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; les deux têtes enseignantes s’accordent sur ce qui est montré ici.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreCommentaire

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations17
Publié2012
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueAnesthesiologyMême sujetIntensive Care Unit Cognitive DisordersTravaux en français237 207