MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2327676531 · doi:10.1097/01.mib.0000438913.47488.60

P-171 Exploring Needs During Transition from Adolescence to Adulthood in Young Adults with Inflammatory Bowel Disease

2013· article· en· W2327676531 sur OpenAlexaff
Romy Cho, Natasha Wickert, Anne F. Klassen, Elena Tsangaris, John K. Marshall, Herbert Brill

Notice bibliographique

RevueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineHealth Professions
ThématiqueAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPsychosocialYoung adultAdult careMedicineCohortInflammatory bowel diseaseHealth carePopulationTransitional careCohort studyDiseaseFamily medicineGerontologyPediatricsPsychiatryPathology

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Adolescents with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are vulnerable to increased morbidity during transition from pediatric to adult health care. Successful transition requires appropriate transfer of care from a pediatric to an adult physician, as well as the transfer of responsibility from parent to patient. To accomplish this, the healthcare team must recognize and understand the attitudes, beliefs, relationships, and developmental maturity of this population. Current approaches to transition are based on expert opinion and limited research on the anticipated needs of adolescents and their families. The aim of this study was to identify the needs of young adults with IBD who transitioned from pediatric to adult care, and to compare them with those of young adults diagnosed during adulthood. A qualitative interpretive description approach was utilized. Participants were young adults aged 18–30 years recruited from the McMaster University Medical Centre adult IBD clinic between July 2012 and May 2013. Semi-structured interviews were conducted using an interview guide with questions probing participants to discuss their needs. Interviews were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim and coded using a constant comparative method. QSR NVivo10 was used to manage the data. Sample size was ascertained when no new additional themes were encountered. 21 young adults were interviewed, including 15 subjects diagnosed under 18 years of age and 6 subjects diagnosed in young adulthood. Among those diagnosed under 18 years of age, a range of transition needs were identified in the key areas of: psychosocial, informational, self-management, and daily living needs. Psychosocial needs were most commonly reported by the cohort with participants citing needs for support networks, to remove social barriers, and to cope with a wide range of emotions, such as anger, depression, sadness, and anxiety. Participants described how IBD made them feel self-conscious and many participants intentionally chose to isolate themselves from social settings. Young adults also reported various domains where they lacked information with the most common knowledge deficiencies around the impact of smoking, drugs, and alcohol use. Participants described a range of informational sources used, as well as a desire for information to be distributed in a client-centered manner. Financial barriers and participation in decision-making were noted as the primary needs in achieving independence. Several findings differed by age of diagnosis and severity of IBD. Subjects diagnosed as adults more often sought peer support groups and experienced more difficulties with healthcare access, financial concerns, and social isolation. Participants with less severe disease sought more client-centered care and those with more severe disease were more likely to describe social isolation. Transition is not a 1-time event and it is important for gastroenterologists to regularly reassess the needs of their patients during both pediatric and early adult care, particularly in the psychosocial, informational, self-management, and daily living domains. Future studies should confirm these needs across multiple centers and evaluate the impact of transition processes that incorporate these needs. Of note, psychosocial needs, have not been addressed in published IBD transition checklists and recommendations.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0020,001
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,003
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,022
Tête enseignante GPT0,282
Écart entre enseignants0,260 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesMême sujetAdolescent and Pediatric HealthcareTravaux en français237 207