Notice bibliographique
Résumé
How should I apply this information? This study describes the outcomes of group physical therapy services for infants with congenital muscular torticollis with or without plagiocephaly and their caregivers. Waiting lists prompted Canadian physical therapists to develop a group program for parent education, and infant assessment and treatment, to increase service delivery efficiency. This model merits consideration as no differences in treatment duration or parent satisfaction between infants treated individually and those in groups were found, though not all infants achieved symmetrical active lateral flexion. Benefits included increased ownership of treatment by the infant's family, role modeling by more confident parents for those more apprehensive, and creating support networks for families who share common concerns. Group services may reinforce home program compliance with consequent shortening of treatment duration, and may be one option to address waiting lists or parents seeking support networks. What should I be mindful of when applying this information? This approach requires staff structuring that supports 2 clinicians and an assistant working collaboratively in a physical environment that accommodates up to 6 infants and their parents. Clinicians need to be mindful of individual baby and family needs, privacy concerns and cultural norms, and in the United States compliance with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act when offering group services. In this study, caregivers consented to sharing medical histories and concerns in a group setting. In addition, skilled handling and manual approaches often require focus and intense concentration, which may be challenged during group services. Because about 25% of the infants did not achieve active symmetrical cervical lateral flexion and long-term implications of residual weakness were not studied, therapists should consider 4- to 6-month follow-up evaluations of infants to screen for asymmetries of movement or developmental delays, whether treated in groups or individually. Finally, the reported cost reductions seem to be institutional, and family savings are not specified except for a shorter wait time. Individualized institutional economic analyses are needed to balance the clinician-to-group size ratio necessary for fiscal stability, with the economic effect on families that have varying payment sources as might be found in the United States. Magdalena Oledzka, PT, MBA, PCS Hospital for Special Surgery, New York City, New York Sandra L. Kaplan PT, DPT, PhD Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».