Development and Qualification of a Subsea 3,000 Barrel Pressure Compensated Chemical Storage and Injection System
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract This paper presents important findings while executing a detailed qualified design of a large (3,000 + barrel), subsea (to depths of 10,000 fsw) production chemical storage and injection system. The design drivers for the system were safety first, extensive utilization of existing commercially available equipment / tools / methods, and a re-usable shuttle system that allows for delivery of production chemicals as a service versus the current approach where an operator / owner makes a capital investment. The system is designed to be compatible with existing production chemical formulations and features multiple barrier design between the chemicals and the environment. Placement of the storage and injection system directly on the seafloor in close proximity to the point of need eliminates expensive chemical umbilicals, removes significant topside chemical storage and injection kit weight and space requirements at host facility and isolates hazardous chemicals from platform workers. The re-deployable shuttle economically allows inspection, repair and maintenance to take place quayside with the ability to upgrade equipment as technology progresses and / or quickly and cost effectively adjust to ever-changing field requirements. Subsea wells have been proliferating over the last decade with ever-longer tie-backs to enable commercial recovery of small resource pools that are unable to support a traditional floating system development. Virtually all wells, especially subsea, require various volumes and types of production chemistries during their operational life. For subsea wells, the incumbent technology is chemistry delivery via umbilicals. In rare occasions, small volumes are sometimes delivered via single trip, disposable containers, principally during intervention activities. As tie-back distances have increased, so have the technical challenges with their attendant mushrooming costs. These challenges include the needs for; special corrosion resistant materials, resistance to high pressures differentials, material flexibility and ‘crimp – resistance’, and long term reliability. Additionally, some of these chemicals are high viscosity and as the tie-back distances increase, so does the pressure drop of the flowing fluids. In some cases, the risks of plugging and the magnitude of the delta-pressure drop in ½? – ¾? chemical tubing within the typical umbilical can preclude tie-backs of long offsets from the host / hub facility. The subject system overcomes many of these challenges by locating a large, pressure compensated storage and injection facility directly on the seafloor in close proximity to the point of need, thus qualifying it as enabling technology for extra-long tie-backs and enhancing technology for short tie-backs, de-bottlenecking, or early production system usage.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».