Johannes Reuchlin and the Campaign to Destroy Jewish Books. By DAVID H. PRICE.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Scholars of early modern Europe will welcome this nuanced and carefully researched account of the Reuchlin affair. David Price's thorough understanding of the political and intellectual currents of the time allows him to bring together the various factors determining the course of the campaign to destroy Hebrew books and the inquisition into Reuchlin's alleged Judaism. Conversely, Price uses Reuchlin's life and career as a prism to reflect the position of Jews in the German Empire. After briefly discussing the modern literature on Reuchlin (ch. 1), he begins his enquiry by examining the role humanism played in shaping Reuchlin's interests and the skills he developed to pursue them (ch. 2). Price then follows Reuchlin's career as courtier in Wurttemberg and, after his exile, in Heidelberg (ch. 3). The chapter illustrates the twin paths of Reuchlin's career, as a courtier and a scholar, showing how his diplomatic missions provided him with opportunities to make contact with learned Jews and acquire Hebrew books. Price continues with a more detailed examination of Reuchlin's Hebrew studies (ch. 4). This includes an instructive discussion of Reuchlin's grammar, a subject not often given the attention it merits. The book was the first manual meant for the instruction of Christians and is an interesting (though not particularly successful) attempt to press Hebrew grammar into a Latin mould. Chapter 4 also touches on Reuchlin's attitude towards the Kabbalah, that is, his Christianizing interpretation of Jewish mysticism. Chapter 5 deals with Johann Pfefferkorn, the converted Jew who initiated the campaign to confiscate Hebrew books and received a mandate from Emperor Maximilian to proceed with his plan. In chapter 6 (dealing with the question ‘Who Saved the Jewish Books’) Price elaborates on the imperial policy and introduces the other players in the affair: the Frankfurt city council, the Archbishop Uriel von Gemmingen, and the theological faculties at the universities of Mainz, Cologne, Paris, and Louvain. In chapters 7 and 8, Price turns to the personal consequences of the campaign for Reuchlin, who had defended the legal rights of the Jews: he was formally accused of Judaism. Price leads us through the various phases of Reuchlin's trial in the inquisitorial courts of Mainz and Speyer and finally at the papal court. He examines the role played by Pfefferkorn's publications, the verdicts of the university theologians, and the polemical tracts of the prosecutor, Jacob Hoogstraeten. These writings found their counterweight in the letters and tracts of Reuchlin's Italian supporters (Benigno, Giles of Viterbo) and in the publicity campaign waged on Reuchlin's behalf by the German humanists (Letters of Obscure Men, Pirckheimer's Apologetic Letter). Chapter 9 is devoted to Luther, his anti-Semitism, and the impact his case had on the final verdict rendered by the papal court: Reuchlin was found guilty as charged, and fined.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,004 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Communication savante | 0,004 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,003 | 0,003 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,122 | 0,051 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».