Abstract 5432: The effect of folic acid supplementation on chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5-fluorouracil in a xenograft model
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: As a mediator of one-carbon transfer reactions, folate is an essential cofactor in nucleotide biosynthesis. Interruption of intracellular folate metabolism and the consequent inhibition of tumor growth has been the basis for chemotherapy using antifolates and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). A growing body of evidence suggests that folic acid (FA; the synthetic form) may promote the progression of established colorectal (pre)neoplastic lesions. Folate blood levels in North America have dramatically increased over the past decade owing to FA fortification and widespread supplement use. Furthermore, over 50% of newly diagnosed colorectal cancer patients use vitamin supplements containing FA in addition to chemotherapeutic agents whose mechanisms of action are based on interruption of folate metabolism. This study therefore investigated whether FA supplementation can affect chemosensitivity of colon cancer cells to 5FU, the cornerstone of colorectal cancer treatment, in vivo. Methods: Male athymic nude mice were placed on the control diet containing 2 mg FA/kg diet and were inoculated with human HCT116 colon cancer cells. When xenografts were established, the animals were randomized to receive a diet containing 2, 8, or 25 mg FA/kg diet for eight weeks. Within each diet group, the animals were further randomized to receive saline vehicle or 5FU (20 mg/kg) + leucovorin (1 mg/kg) for five days. The primary endpoints were the rate of xenograft growth and the final volume. At necropsy, blood was collected and xenografts were harvested and evidence of metastasis was determined. Results: Plasma folate concentrations of animals on the 2 mg FA diet were significantly lower than those of animals fed the 8 and 25 mg FA diets (p<0.05). Xenograft folate concentrations significantly reflected the supplemental levels of FA in a dose-responsive manner (p=0.002). The effect of dietary levels of FA and 5FU alone were not significant, p=0.907 and p=0.193, respectively, but the interaction effect was significant (p<0.007). 5FU was beneficial only to animals fed the 2 mg FA diet (p<0.0001). In contrast, animals fed the 8 mg FA diet fared worse on 5FU (p=0.048) whereas animals fed the 25 mg FA diet demonstrated no effect of 5FU (p=0.31). All animals exhibited macroscopically evident lymph node involvement, but no distant metastases, irrespective of dietary levels of FA. Conclusion: Our data suggests that FA supplementation may adversely affect chemosensitivity to 5FU chemotherapy, although a dose-responsive relationship was not evident. Results of this study pose a legitimate public health concern given the drastically increased intake of FA from supplements, particularly among recently diagnosed colorectal cancer patients and from mandatory fortification. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings and to elucidate the underlying mechanisms. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 103rd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2012 Mar 31-Apr 4; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2012;72(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5432. doi:1538-7445.AM2012-5432
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».