MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2329606975 · doi:10.1097/01.cot.0000451734.26163.10

Prostate Cancer

2014· article· en· W2329606975 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Peter Goodwin

Notice bibliographique

RevueOncology Times · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueProstate Cancer Treatment and Research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésProstate cancerMedicineInternal medicineOncologyRadiation therapyDiseaseCancerComparative genomic hybridizationProstateGynecologyGeneGenomeBiologyGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

FigureIn initial research, men with prostate cancer assessed by standard clinical factors as “intermediate risk” are able to have their risk more accurately assessed as either high or low by use of a new test looking at a 100-locus DNA signature to measure genomic instability along with an index of tumor hypoxia. The research was reported at the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology Congress (Abstract O-0139). Robert G. Bristow, PhD, MD, a clinician-scientist at Princess Margaret Cancer Center and Professor at the University of Toronto, presented findings showing that among patients who went on to have image-guided radiotherapy, 93 percent of men with low levels of genetic alterations and low hypoxia in their tumor biopsy samples survived five years without recurrence as compared with only 49 percent of men with high levels of both. As background, he explained that because 30 to 50 percent of prostate cancer patients have disease relapse within two years and have the highest risk of dying from their disease, a different test has been needed to identify them since existing clinical assessments at first diagnosis are not able to do so. “These men can then be offered additional treatments, such as chemotherapy and hormone therapy, that will combat the prostate cancer throughout their body, rather than therapies solely focused on the prostate, in order to improve their chances of survival,” he said at an ESTRO news conference. Array Comparative Genomic Hybridization For the study, the genomic test used array comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH) to identify genome alterations in the DNA in pre-treatment biopsies from 126 men who had been risk-assessed by having a Gleason score 6 or 7; T1-T2, and PSA level below 20 mg/ml. Patients then had image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) and were followed for a at a median of 7.8 years. Alterations in copy numbers of specific genes and at so-called fragile sites were detected, and tumors were scored for generalized genomic instability by measuring the percentage of genome altered. Similar genomic assays were also completed for a comparator cohort of 150 clinically staged patients who went on to have radical prostatectomy. The researchers measured tumor hypoxia in each patient treated with IGRT by using an Eppendorf pO2 probe and assessed the effect each patient's hypoxia had on 220 genes involved with genomic stability and the translation of DNA repair. “This is the first report of a test using information derived from biopsy samples that can predict with close to 80 percent accuracy which men are at high or low risk of their prostate cancer recurring,” Bristow said. Asked for his opinion for this article, Adam P. Dicker, MD, PhD, Professor and Chair of the Department of Radiation Oncology at Thomas Jefferson University, said that what makes this test different is that it looks at the tumor microenvironment. Although it has been known for years that tumors are hypoxic and that this is related to genetic instability, which in turn is associated with the aggressiveness of a cancer, it has been difficult for companies to harness this process and market it commercially because hypoxia had to be assessed in vivo. The next step is to attempt to validate the test over the next two to three years in different and larger groups of patients. In a news release from the conference, ESTRO Immediate Past President Vincenzo Valentini, MD, a radiation oncologist at Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli in Rome, said, “This is exciting research, because an accurate and quick test that can predict which men are most likely to need extra treatment to reduce the risk of a recurrence of their cancer is urgently needed. If the utility of this genetic signature is confirmed in further research over the next few years, it could become an important tool for helping us to better target appropriate treatment according to the genetic makeup of each man's tumor.”

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesCharge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,701
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,999

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,024
Tête enseignante GPT0,376
Écart entre enseignants0,352 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2014
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOncology TimesMême sujetProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchTravaux en français237 207