Pandemic A (H1N1) Influenza in Hospitalized Children in Warsaw, Poland
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
To the Editors: The report by Kumar et al1 on hospitalized children with pandemic influenza prompts us to present our data on pandemic variant A (H1N1) influenza, confirmed with reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction in 100 children (51 boys and 49 girls) with a median age of 5 years and 2 months. Most of them (85%) were diagnosed between November 15 and December 30, 2009; no case was diagnosed after January 2010. All children were admitted to Warsaw hospitals for diagnosis and therapy. Of the 100 children, 48 (48%) children had underlying medical conditions recognized as risk factors for serious influenza infection (Table 1).TABLE 1: Leading Risk FactorsBecause pandemic influenza vaccines were not purchased and registered in Poland, none of our patients had been vaccinated against A (H1N1) influenza. (The Polish Ministry of Health did not decide for central purchase of any of the “pandemic” vaccines, because the experts regarded investigations on safety as insufficient and requested that producers to take responsibility for possible adverse effects. After prolonged negotiations, producers have refused this request.) Ninety-six patients had clinically apparent influenza infection. The leading symptoms were as follows: fever in 89.6%, cough in 70.8%, coryza in 53.1%, sore throat in 34.4%, digestive tract disorders (vomiting, diarrhea, abdominal pain) in 25.0%, malaise (muscle and/or bone pains) in 19.8%, headache in 13.5%, dyspnea in 10.4%, and conjunctivitis in 7.3%. In 20 of the 96 (20.3%) cases, influenza was complicated by pneumonia. Of these, 11 (55%) children had risk factors; 4 of the latter required intensive care and mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress and heart failure. Three children died: 2 with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and 1 with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and congenital heart defect complicated by pulmonary hypertension. In 62 of 100 (62%) children, oseltamivir was administered. In 4 of 100 children with hematologic malignancy, prophylactic oseltamivir treatment was given, and despite the fact that A (H1N1) infection was confirmed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, symptomatic influenza did not develop in these children. In the remaining 58 of 100 (58%) children, oseltamivir was used for treatment and in 25 of 58 (43%) children, antibiotic therapy was also given. In most of these children, 57 of 62 (91%), oseltamivir was well tolerated. The clinical course of A (H1N1) influenza infection was similar to seasonal influenza, as has been reported from the United States and Canada.2–4 Andrzej Radzikowski, MD, PhD Łukasz Dembiński, MD Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition Medical University of Warsaw Public Paediatric Teaching Hospital Ewa Talarek, MD, PhD Department of Children's Infectious Diseases Medical University of Warsaw Hospital of Infectious Diseases Katarzyna Smalisz-Skrzypczyk, MD Department of Paediatrics, Haematology and Oncology Medical University of Warsaw Public Paediatric Teaching Hospital Warsaw, Poland Teresa Jackowska, MD, PhD Clinical Department of Paediatrics Medical Centre for Postgraduate Education Warsaw, Poland Magdalena Marczyńska, MD, PhD Department of Children's Infectious Diseases Medical University of Warsaw Hospital of Infectious Diseases Warsaw, Poland
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,006 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».